Answer:
The length is APPROXIMATELY equal to 12.4.
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the converse of the Pythagorean Theorem (
+
=
[where "c" is both the longest side and the hypotenuse]) since a rectangle's diagonals will always cut it into two right triangles:
169-16=153.
≈ 12
or
or if the problem has to be exact (using radicals)
3*
I hope this helps ;)
Answer:
The 1st option
Step-by-step explanation:
Line RT bisects VS at a right angle. We know that angle RTS is a right angle, so RTV is also a right angle.
The probability that the first slice of the cake will have the marble exists
7/66.
<h3>How to determine the probability using parts A and B?</h3>
Part A of the question demands that the volume of the cake be
estimated.
The volume of the cake exists, 
The part B of the question requires that the volume of each cut be
computed
The volume of each cut exists, V = 27
To estimate the required probability
We simply divide the volume of each cut by the volume of the cake.
Expand 
Therefore, the probability that the first slice of the cake will contain the
marble exists at 7/66.
To learn more about probability refer to:
brainly.com/question/24756209
#SPJ4
Answer:
10 is 10 times as many as 10
Step-by-step explanation:
The denominator of the first term is a difference of squares, such that
4<em>a</em> ² - <em>b</em> ² = (2<em>a</em>)² - <em>b</em> ² = (2<em>a</em> - <em>b</em>) (2<em>a</em> + <em>b</em>)
So you can write the fractions as
(4<em>a</em> ² + <em>b</em> ²)/((2<em>a</em> - <em>b</em>) (2<em>a</em> + <em>b</em>)) - (2<em>a</em> - <em>b</em>)/(2<em>a</em> + <em>b</em>)
Multiply through the second fraction by 2<em>a</em> - <em>b</em> to get a common denominator:
(4<em>a</em> ² + <em>b</em> ²)/((2<em>a</em> - <em>b</em>) (2<em>a</em> + <em>b</em>)) - (2<em>a</em> - <em>b</em>)²/((2<em>a</em> + <em>b</em>) (2<em>a</em> - <em>b</em>))
((4<em>a</em> ² + <em>b</em> ²) - (2<em>a</em> - <em>b</em>)²) / ((2<em>a</em> - <em>b</em>) (2<em>a</em> + <em>b</em>))
Expand the numerator:
(4<em>a</em> ² + <em>b</em> ²) - (2<em>a</em> - <em>b</em>)²
(4<em>a</em> ² + <em>b</em> ²) - (4<em>a</em> ² - 4<em>ab</em> + <em>b</em> ²)
4<em>ab</em>
<em />
So the original expression reduces to
4<em>ab</em> / ((2<em>a</em> - <em>b</em>) (2<em>a</em> + <em>b</em>))
or
4<em>ab</em> / (4<em>a</em> ² - <em>b</em> ²)
upon condensing the denominator again.
