Answer:
No, They are not equivalent
Step-by-step explanation:
The two expressions are only said to be equivalent if they are the same regardless of whatever value the variable(s) is.
The variable in this question is x.
To prove this, we equate both expressions:


This shows that they have the same value ONLY when x is 1.
This is why Andre says that they are equivalent, but they are not.
When you see the symbol "△", this denotes a triangle. Now combine the symbol with the letters FGH, this becomes △FGH, meaning a triangle FGH, with F, G, and H as the three points.
Now, the symbol "∠" means angle and "m∠" means the measure of an angle. So m∠F means the angle at the point F, m∠G means the angle at the point G, and m∠H means the angle at the point H. (I'll attach a diagram of this triangle).
Now we have to determine m∠H, which is the angle at point H. To do that, we have to find the value of
. To do that, we have to use one of the laws of a triangle, which is:
The sum of angles in a triangle = 180°. This means when we add all the angles in a triangle, it sums up to 180°. Let's do that.

Now that we have found the value of x as 18°, we can substitute its value to determine the angle H.

I hope you understand the explanation.
Answer:
300 150
Step-by-step explanation:
The price of the garden table is two times the price of the bench. What is the cost of the bench? x=150 for the bench. 2*150=300 for the table.