Since it’s 2020 and we are going through a pandemic atm you could put someone like: An action I would take to improve their health of my school would be to have classrooms sanitized and bathrooms have refilled soap. This will improve less germs to spread and less people to get sick. Once someone gets sick their immune system is low and they are at higher risk to catch something worse.
(I put for bathrooms to have soap refilled because ik my school sucks at that XD) but you’d am always change how you word it.
Industry would have unlimited ability to produce chemicals for use as pesticides, additives, etc without being required to measure their effects on people or their accumulation in water or soils and their impact on the environment, their toxicity, and potential exposure hazard
Waste water would be monitored, but there would be no limits or benchmarks for the levels of contaminants in the water
Automobile manufacturers would not be required to adhere to achieve a specific benchmark for noxious gas output, and cars would not be monitored for their output over time. It is debatable if gas mileage would be a consideration, as the only motivator for manufacturers to increase fuel economy would be the price of fuel and consumer willingness to bear the burden of fuel costs
<span>These tests are listed in order of increasing rigor. The PAR-Q is a written assessment that predicts one's readiness for exercise. The other three require the help of a health professional to complete. Medical screenings and medical evaluations are both performed by a doctor, but the medical evaluation is more in-depth. Finally, the exercise stress test is designed to test the response of the body while exercising vigorously. This test is usually only used when a problem is suspected that could endanger the participant's life. (This is the word-for-word answer, so make sure you reword this before you answer the question.)</span>
