1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fgiga [73]
2 years ago
6

Is 48 a perfect cube? Explain your reasoning.

Mathematics
1 answer:
Ksivusya [100]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

No

Reasoning:

If something is a perfect cube, it is able to be put under a cube root (\sqrt[3]{..}) and will result in an integer (a non-decimal number > 0, basically).

So let's calculate \sqrt[3]{48}, and see if the result is an integer.

\sqrt[3]{48} = 3.634.......

As you can see, the result is not an integer, therefore 48 is not a perfect cube.

You might be interested in
9. A recent study examining the effects of sugar consumption on a middle
ExtremeBDS [4]

Answer:

(B) Because the confidence interval includes 0, we don't have convincing evidence that sugar causes faster reading times, on average.

Step-by-step explanation:

Confidence Interval for the population mean difference in reading is basically an interval of range of values where the true population mean difference in reading time can be found with a certain level of confidence.

Mathematically,

Confidence Interval = (Sample mean) ± (Margin of error)

In using confidence interval of population mean difference in reading times for hypothesis testing, if the interval obtained contains a value of 0, it means the population mean difference in reading times can take on a value of 0 and indicate that there isn't enough evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the two quantities being compared. (The null hypothesis is true).

If the interval doesn't contain a 0, then it can be concluded that there is enough evidence to conclude that there is significant difference in the two quantities being compared.

Hope this Helps!!!

6 0
3 years ago
A straight angel forms a line true or false
alisha [4.7K]
True. If the angle is straight it must be 180 degrees, then it's just a line
6 0
3 years ago
The strength of a certain type of rubber is tested by subjecting pieces of the rubber to an abrasion test. For the rubber to be
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

You have the hypothesis that the average weight loss for rubber after an abrasion test is less than 3.5 mg. To test this a large sample of pieces of rubber were sampled and subjected to the abrasion test.

With the given information you must test whether the researcher's hypothesis is sustained or not.

The study variable is,

X: Weight loss of rubber cured in a certain way after being subjected to the abrasion test. (mg)

There is no information about the variable distribution, but since it is said that the sample is a "large number" I'll take it as if it is bigger than 30 and apply the Central Limit Theorem to use the approximation of the sample mean to normal. This way I can use the Z-statistic for the test.

Symbolically the statistic hypothesis is:

H₀: μ ≥ 3.5

H₁: μ < 3.5

α: 0.05 (since is not listed, I'll choose one of the most common signification levels)

You have a one-tailed critical region, this means the p-value will also be one-tailed to the left of the distribution (i.e. →-∞)

The formula of the statistic is:

Z= <u> X[bar] - μ </u> ≈ N(0;1)

        δ/√n

To calculate the statistic you have to use the information given.

The sample mean X[bar]= 3.4 mg

Upper bond of 95% CI= 3.45 mg

The basic structure of a CI for the mean is

"estimator" ± "margin of error"

Upper bound is "estimator" + "margin of error"

Using the formula:

Ub= X[bar] + d ⇒ 3.45= 3.4 + d

⇒ d= 3.45 - 3.4 = 0.05

Where d is the margin of error

d= Z_{1-\alpha /2} * (δ/√n)

d= Z_{0.975} * (δ/√n)

d/Z_{0.975}= (δ/√n)

(δ/√n)= 0.05/ 1.96 = 0.0255

(δ/√n) is the denominator in the formula, corresponds to the standard deviation of the distribution.

Now you have all values and can calculate the statistic under the null hypothesis:

Z= <u> 3.4 - 3.5 </u> = -3.92

       0.0255

And the p-value:

P(Z ≤ -3.92) = 0.000044 ⇒ My Z- table goes up to P(Z ≤ -3.00) = 0.001, so using strictly the table I can say that the probability is less than 0.001.

To calculate the exact probability I've used a statistic program.

p-value < 0.001

I hope it helps!

8 0
3 years ago
When constructing a polygon how can you be sure
ikadub [295]
Make sure it has eight sides
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the slope of the line x=9
Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:

"undefined"

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope of any vertical line is "undefined". There is no horizontal change for any vertical change you might like, so computation of the slope involves division by zero. The result of division by zero is "undefined."

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Find the quotient of -4 and -9.
    11·1 answer
  • I have two questions.
    10·1 answer
  • In its monthly report, the local animal shelter states that it currently has 24 dogs and 18 cats available for adoption. Eight o
    15·1 answer
  • How do you solve word problems with fractions?
    10·2 answers
  • Answer now plzzzzzzzzzzz 2+4=
    5·1 answer
  • Find the volume of the sphere. Either enter an exact answer in terms of \piπpi or use 3.143.143, point, 14 for \piπpi and round
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP WILL MARK BRAINIEST AND NO LINKS!!!!
    8·1 answer
  • The sum of a rational number and an irrational number equals.
    12·2 answers
  • The time it takes to travel a fixed distance varies inversely with the speed traveled. It takes
    11·1 answer
  • Find the area of the region (in square units) exact number
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!