You do 4 x 56 = 224. It’s just multiplication.
When you evaluate the function f (x) = 4 • 7 ^ x for x = -1 you get:
f (-1) = 4 * 7 ^ -1
f(-1) = 4* 1/7
f (-1) = 0.5714
The next part of the question is not clear. If it refers to the function at x = 2 then:
f (2) = 4 * 7 ^ (2)
f(2) =4*49
f (2) = 196
If it refers to it in x ^ 2
f (x ^ 2) = 4 * 7 ^ (x ^ 2)
Answer:
-338908990377
Step-by-step explanation:
that is the answer
Answer:
we can conclude that there is no significant evidence to conclude that the mean score in 2010 differs from the mean score in 2009.
Step-by-step explanation:
H0 : μ = 582
H1 : μ < 582
Test statistic :
T = (xbar - μ) ÷ σ/√n
Xbar = 515 ; n = 20 ; σ = 120
T = (515 - 582) ÷ 120/√20
T = -67 / 26.832815
T = 2.50
Pvalue at t score = 2.50 ; df = 19 is 0.0187
At α = 0.0187
Pvalue > α ; Hence, we fail to reject the Null
Hence, we can conclude that there is no significant evidence to conclude that the mean score in 2010 differs from the mean score in 2009.
Ur answer will be - A≈69.65cm².
<u><em>Hope this helps!!</em></u>
