1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shutvik [7]
3 years ago
12

40 POINTS PLZ HELP

Biology
1 answer:
Anon25 [30]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1) nonliving

2) heat

3) ions

4) recycle

5) photosynthesis

6) Animals

You might be interested in
What is the nervous system composed of?
Maru [420]

Answer: D) the central and peripheral nervous systems

hope this helps

8 0
2 years ago
5. The Ribosome is the site of
joja [24]
It’s protein synthesis!!
3 0
3 years ago
The ____ is the large opening in the base of the occipital bone where the brain connects to the spinal cord.
elena-s [515]
The skull is the large opening in the base of the occipital bone where the brain connects to the spinal cord
4 0
3 years ago
At a particular location in the human genome is the sequence AATGGAGTC on one of the chromosomes. This sequence occurs in about
ser-zykov [4K]

Answer:

c. AATGGAGTT

d. AATAGAGTC

Explanation:

SNP is a single nucleotide polymorphism. It means that a particular sequence varies among the members of a population with respect to the single nucleotide. The given sequence of the human genome is "AATGGAGTC". The sequence "AATGGAGTT" of option C differs from it with respect to the single nucleotide at the last position (C is replaced with T).

Similarly, the sequence of option D "AATAGAGTC" differs with respect to the nucleotide at position 4 (G in the original sequence is replaced with A). Therefore, these two sequences represent SNP with respect to the given sequence of the human genome.

4 0
3 years ago
I REALLY DO NEED HELP PLEASE!
Lena [83]

Part (a)

Enter the data into your calculator or a spreadsheet. Then perform an exponential regression to find the curve of best fit. This is the closest exponential function we can assign to each population, to measure it's approximate growth.

Let functions f, g and h represent group 1 through 3 in that exact order. You should get these approximate functions:

  • f(x) = 6830.52397(0.92755)^x
  • g(x) = 3969.81548(1.00295)^x
  • h(x) = 5.67328(1.42775)^x

Note: Group 3 doesn't have its population start until 1995, which is 10 years after 1985. This means h(x) only works when x \ge 10 or it's meaningless otherwise.

Each function found is of the form y = a*b^x, where 'a' is the initial population (at time x = 0) and b helps determine the growth rate. We set b equal to 1+r and solve for r to get the growth rate.

For f(x), we have b = 0.92755 approximately. Set that equal to 1+r and solve for r

1+r = 0.92755

r = 0.92755-1

r = -0.07245

The negative growth rate indicates we have population decline. Specifically, the rate of decline is about 7.245%

Repeat those steps for the b value of g(x) and you should find that r = 0.00295 meaning we have roughly a 0.295% increase for Mussel group 2.

Group 3 has a growth rate of about 42.775% due to r = 0.42775 in this case. The steps will be the same as for group 1.

=========================================================

Part (b)

The graph is shown below as an image attachment. I used GeoGebra to make the graph, and to also find the exponential regression equations.

We have x as the number of years since 1985, which is the starting point, and y is the population size. Something like (0,4800) means in the year 1985, the population is 4800 mussels (see group 1).

Keep in mind that the green curve for h(x) doesn't make sense for positive x values smaller than 10, due to the fact that the third group wasn't introduced until 10 years after the starting point of 1985.

Also, be sure not to think that the blue g(x) curve is linear. It looks like a flat line, but it's really a very stretched out curve. This is because the growth rate is very small.

=========================================================

Part (c)

It appears that group 3 has caused group 1's population to decline, due to the red points (see part b) going downhill as we move from left to right. This drop-off occurs at around the time group 3 is introduced. Strangely, only group 1 is affected while group 2's population is still increasing. This increase is not much, but it's still a positive growth rate. So it's fairly likely that there are other confounding variables to consider, and it's not entirely group 3 that's causing the trouble.

=========================================================

Part (d)

There are many ways that people impact their environment, whether it's a positive or negative impact. When regarding this topic of marine life, specifically mussels, one way that humans affect the population is what was mentioned earlier: The fact that the third group of mussels was introduced to the habitat. Often, though not always, if you introduce a new species to some environment, then the species of animals already living there may have a hard time coping with the newcomer. The new species would be referred to as "an invasive species". The invasive species is more aggressive at getting food to crowd out the older species that isn't used to the newcomer. This may explain why Mussel group 1 experiences a decline after 1995 when group 3 is introduced. This decline is fairly significant as the graph in part (b) shows.  Group 2 doesn't seem to be affected at all since it's growth rate is fairly flat yet steadily increasing even if done slowly. It's possible that group 2 is simply more adapted to deal with competition better than group 1.

Another way humans impact the environment is through pollution. Air pollution may contribute to acid rainfall that would lead to the ocean. There's also chemical pollution such as flushing harmful chemicals down the drain, which also leads to the ocean. This could apply to the average consumer, or to very big industrial companies. For instance, in the news recently in Florida, there was a very big worry that a holding pond could contribute to a spike in algae growth. While algae are beneficial, there are some species that invade more than their fair share of resources and kill off anything else more or less. This is one example where pollution contributes to harmful consequences to unfortunate species who likely die off. On top of pollution, there's general habitat loss that also may explain why group 1 is experiencing a sharp decline (however it wouldn't explain why groups 2 and 3 are growing).

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • I'm writing a 5 para for science ab skin cancer. i have a lot of info but i am having trouble wording it. how should i paraphras
    7·1 answer
  • ILL MARK BRAINLY! Trey and Connie were raising pigs for their 4-H project. The students fed their piglets a variation of two fee
    10·1 answer
  • Which job must enzymes do before replication can begin?
    10·1 answer
  • Why might some women not have signs or symptoms of breast cancer?
    14·2 answers
  • Under the 1980 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act, each state must take responsibility for its non-defense related, low-leve
    6·1 answer
  • What goes in the charts ??
    10·1 answer
  • What does it mean to say science is a systematic process
    12·1 answer
  • CAN ANYONE HELP ME WITH THE QUESTION ABOVE
    12·1 answer
  • A bear is capable of eating fruits to
    12·1 answer
  • HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!