1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Komok [63]
3 years ago
13

Why did the odawa join in the french and indian war ?

Social Studies
1 answer:
astraxan [27]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

As the French became more aggressive the Six Nations moved toward neutrality.” ... After the war began to turn in England's favor in 1758, the Iroquois decided to officially join the war as allies to the British. Realizing that the British might win, the Iroquois reasoned it would benefit them to be on the winning side.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Candice is presented with a moral dilemma. She responds by saying that the person in the dilemma should choose a course of actio
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

d. conventional

Explanation:

Kohlberg did some studies on morality and proposed a theory on moral development.

Kohlberg defined three different levels of morality (and each level consists in 2 stages). These levels are:

  • preconventional,
  • conventional and
  • postconventional

In the preconventional level, the person's morality is externally controlled and therefore acts based on what the punishment or reward will be (1st stage) or based on how good will it be for him/her to act in some way (2nd stage)

The conventional level stages also have to to with external controls but now the person thinks in function of ensure positive relationships and societal order. The third stage here depends on the approval of others. The fourth stage has to do with accepting rules because they preserve the society order  and functioning.

The postconventional level stages are defined in more abstract principles or values. The 5th stage sees the world as a place with different values that must be respected. Finally the 6th stage is based in universal ethical abstract principles.

In this example, Candice is presented with a moral dilemma, she said the person should take a course of action that will ensure that the community will not disapprove of the person's action. We can see that<u> her response has to do with external controls, specifically with the approval of the community as a whole. </u>We know that in the conventional level, the 3rd stage has to do with the approval of others. Therefore, Candice's response reflects Lawrence Kohlberg's conventional level of moral development.

3 0
4 years ago
Why did the United States invade Iraq in 2003?
VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

The United States believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which posed a great threat at the hands of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein. It also believed that terrorists were supported and even harbored by the country. So, to remove the dictator from power and to get rid of any weapons and eliminate or drive out terrorists were the main objectives behind the attack on Iraq.

Explanation:

The rationale behind the motive to invade and attack Iraq was to primarily <u>end the regime of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein</u>. Other purposes were to <u>end the harboring of terrorists in the land</u> and <u>eliminate any weapons of mass destruction that Iraq was believed to be in possession of</u>.

The attack on Iraq by the United States in 2003 was based on US's beliefs that the Arab nation has disobeyed the demands of the United Nations and had harbored and supported terrorists. Moreover, the need to eliminate the dictator Saddam Hussein and establish a democratic government and provide peace to the Iraq people also became the main objective behind the invasion. The US also believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which can act as a huge threat to the overall safety of everyone around the world. So, the need to identify, isolate and destroy such weapons before they are actually put into use also led to the attack. US military continued to stay in Iraq till 2011 after which all troops were withdrawn.

5 0
3 years ago
The​ statement, "A person who eats meat and then fights for animal rights demonstrates double​ standards" is an evaluative state
sergey [27]

Answer:

Cognitive

Explanation:

Attitude is the generalized way a person thinks and acts when presented with a situation.

The cognitive component of attitude is responsible for why the person feels and behaves the way they do when presented with a situation.

For example, a person is afraid of snakes, this is the affective component of attitude

As a result the person avoids snakes, this is the behavioral component of attitude.

The above two components are dependent on the cognitive component as the person thinks of snakes as dangerous.

Here, the statement indicates why the person the feels and behaves the way he/she does when confronted by a person that contradicts themselves.

Hence, this shows the cognitive component of attitude.

6 0
3 years ago
In contrast to bentham, kant thinks this is the most important human characteristic
dimaraw [331]
Kant's view is that Reason is the most important human characteristic. 
4 0
3 years ago
Which statement is FALSE?
fgiga [73]

Answer:

is going to be A.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In Rome, February 15 was Lupercalia, an annual festival celebrating the myth of the she-wolf that saved the lives of the infant
    11·1 answer
  • Roger has a good amount on his plate. He works full-time, has a part-time job, and has a new consulting company in response to h
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the effects of cultural diversity among the American people during the late 20th and early 21st centuries.
    15·1 answer
  • What governing document was drawn up before the pilgrims went ashore
    8·2 answers
  • The Cold War impacted every aspect of American life. Discuss the domestic implications of the Cold War. Your essay should explai
    5·1 answer
  • Is it likely an extremist party to emerge on either end of the political spectrum?
    5·1 answer
  • What would SC would have said about the Texas Annexation.
    9·1 answer
  • Why couldn’t Darius’ chariot get away, how was it stuck?
    9·1 answer
  • Who did the democratic-republicans want to support, during the war between france and britain?
    15·1 answer
  • If you are ambidextrous, switching hands will result in a clearer sign message.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!