A path is 0.75m wide mrkessel extends the width by placing blocks 20cm wide on each side of the path what is the new width of th
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer: ≈
Step-by-step explanation:
You need to find the value of the variable "x".
To solve for "x" you need to apply the following property of logarithms:
Apply logarithm on both sides of the equation:
Now, applying the property mentioned before, you can rewrite the equation in this form:
Finally, you can apply the Division property of equality, which states that:
Therefore, you need to divide both sides of the equation by . Finally, you get:
≈
Answer:
Choices 1 and 4 are correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
We first need to find what the slope of the line is. That way, we can find out which possible answers are perpendicular to it:
Since we now have the slope, we need the negative reciprocal of it. Remember: if x is the slope, it's negative reciprocal will be . Therefore, if the line's slope is 3, then we need to find answers with a slope of
.
The first answer is correct, as you have marked. The second answer, while written a little weirdly, does show the slope as 3, which we know as wrong. The third choice is not correct, however. This equation is written in point-slope form, where. The only variable we have to worry about is m, which, in the third choice, is 3. The fourth answer is correct, which sounds weird at first. Let's put that equation into slope-intercept form:
Equations like these can be real sneaky, so it's important not to jump to conclusions with them.