Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Many constitutional monarchies started out as, would be: Absolute monarchies.
Explanation:
The big difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy, is the limitations placed on the power exercised by a monarch, or head ruler, of a country. In ancient times, this became the norm, especially in Europe, where the absolute power of kings was unquestioned and unchecked by anyone. However, even if kingdoms all over the world started out as absolute monarchies, with the King or Queen being the only law in the land, this changed through time, until these rulers became bound by another law; that of a constitution. This is the case of England, and other such nations, where government went from being solely in the hands of a ruler, to the ruler´s power being chained by constitutions. Today, many of the monarchies only have Kings and Queens as symbols, but they play no part in government.
Answer: The test/procedure that was performed was the One-sided t-test.
Explanation:
The one-sided t-test was performed because they were checking if the average of one variable is larger than the average of the other variable used.
The P-value/margin of error is 3.59609E-07 and the statistical interpretation of this is the value of the P-value was much smaller than 5%. This let the test result conclusive.
The other test that is performed in some of these cases are called the two-sided t-test.
Answer:
When theres someone in my swamp
Explanation:
Answer:
It was the Southern colonies.
Explanation:
Disease in colonial America that afflicted the early immigrant settlers was a dangerous threat to life. Malaria was deadly to many new arrivals, especially in the Southern colonies.
Answer:
The governor shall appoint
