Answer:
Option A is correct because the level of saving in percentage for company A is 2% (5000/250000). Whereas the level of saving in the company B is 1.5% which is lower than the savings of company A. This will increase the standard of life in the long run because greater the savings the greater is the amount invested in Financial assets which will decline the interest rate as the funds for investment are in excess it will decline the demand for loans. This investment will earn its investor more which will change his standard of life.
Remember standard of living is measured by:
GDP per capita= Total GDP/ Total population
So if the GDP per person is higher it means his saving are lower. And if the level of saving are lower then the standard of living will decline because the money available for investment is lower in amount. This will not save him enough to maintain his standard of living.
So its true because the level of saving rate of company A is higher this means the standard of living in the near future will also increase with faster pace.
The adjusting entry required for unearned rent on December 31, 20Y1 is: Debit Unearned rental revenue $16,296;Credit Rental revenue $16,296.
<h3 /><h3>Unearned rent</h3>
Based on the information given the appropriate adjusting entry required for unearned rent on December 31, 20Y1 is:
31 December
Debit Unearned rental revenue $16,296
Credit Rental revenue $16,296
($39,110×5/12)
(To record unearned rent)
Inconclusion the adjusting entry required for unearned rent on December 31, 20Y1 is: Debit Unearned rental revenue $16,296;Credit Rental revenue $16,296.
Learn more about unearned rent here:brainly.com/question/4260123
Answer:
$46,500
Explanation:
Accounting equation is stated as :
Assets = Equity + Liabilities
therefore,
Equity = Assets - Liabilities
Equity at Beginning of the Period :
Equity = Assets - Liabilities
= $78,000 - $42,000
= $36,000
Equity at end of the Period
Closing Equity Balance = Opening Balance + Net Income - Dividends
= $36,000 + $15,500 - $5,000
= $46,500
Answer:
The Home owner commenced the action in a state A court ( C )
Explanation:
The Defendant ( the contractor) can decide to transfer the case from a state court to a federal court within the same state in which the case was filled by the The home owner if the federal court has the Jurisdiction to rule on the case
Since the contract was signed in state A under the laws of the state the case is definitely a state case and the Homeowner's move to remand the case to a state court with the argument that the Federal court lacks proper Jurisdiction is in order. The court decision on the matter will be based on the fact that the Homeowner commenced the action in a state A court where the contract was signed.
