Meters for mass kilograms for volume cubic meters for density kilograms per cubic meter
The biggest thing you're doing wrong is ignoring the units
when you're working with the quantities.
Now let's look at the rest of the problem:
The formula you used is correct:
Net flux through the surface = (net charge inside) / ε₀
and ε₀ = 8.85 x 10⁻¹² farad/meter.
What's the net charge inside the surface in this problem ?
It's (5.85 x 10⁷ electrons) x (the charge on each electron)
= (5.85 x 10⁷ electrons) x (-1.6 x 10⁻¹⁹ coulomb/electron)
= -9.36 x 10⁻¹² coulomb .
Finally, (net charge inside) / ε₀
= (-9.36 x 10⁻¹² coulomb) / (8.85 x 10⁻¹² farad/meter)
= -1.058 newton-m²/coulomb .
The sign and the significant figures in your answer are correct, so
we can see that you know what you're doing. The only thing left is
the order of magnitude. You most likely took one of the negative
exponents and made it positive. You got an answer that's 10²² too
small. Big deal. You could claim "that's close", and see whether you
can convince a teacher.
<span>The bending of light rays by sun is twice in Einstein's theory as in Newton's theory of gravitation. Einstein's theory was verified by Eddington during the solar eclipse in 1919
Also observed precession of aphelion of mercury completely explained by Einstein's theory but not by Newtonian gravity</span>
(i)1.5cm
(ii)4.5cm
(iii)10cm