According to this text manner, it would most likely be said that being a speaker is faced with a responsibility to know the topic to be discussed and be relayed rationally and intellectually.
Thank you for your question. Please don't hesitate to ask in Brainly your queries.
You are a criminologist and or a forensic scientist.
He believed in heliocentialism, or that the Earth was the center of the universe.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
In telecommunication, it is hard to deal with as it involves communication and interactions with other people. The major concern about employees and managers is that because of it's difficulty, it makes managers lose their control to their employees that could complicate things and affect the people working in the area. That is why it is the major concern in telecommunication.
