Answer : 4 times
Here it's given that ,
- The height and base of the butterfly sitting on the stem (red butterfly) is two times greater than the height and base of the butterfly sitting on the flower .
And we need to find out how many times the area of red winged butterfly is greater than that of sitting on the flower (blue butterfly) .
Let us take ,
- base of blue butterfly be b
- height of blue butterfly be h
- Area be A .
Then ,
- base of red butterfly will be 2b .
- height of red butterfly will be 2h .
- Area be A' .
We know that ,
→ area of the triangle = 1/2 × base × height
So that ,
→ A/A' = (1/2 * b * h) ÷ (1/2 *2b *2h)
→ A/A' = bh/4bh
→ A/A' = 1/4
→ A' = 4A
<u>Henceforth</u><u> the</u><u> area</u><u> of</u><u> </u><u>blue</u><u> butterfly</u><u> is</u><u> </u><u>4</u><u> </u><u>times </u><u>greater</u><u> than</u><u> </u><u>that</u><u> of</u><u> </u><u>red </u><u>winged</u><u> butterfly</u><u> </u><u>.</u>
I hope this helps.
Answer:
11%
Step-by-step explanation:
1/3 (twix)
1/3 (snicker)
1/3 x 1/3 = 1/9
1/9 = .11
.11 = 11%
Answer:
The greater percent of cell phone ownership in Japan than the U.S was <u>13.7%</u>.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
About 543 out of every 1,000 people in United States owned a cell phone in 2003.
In japan,the are was 68 for every 100 people.
Now, to find the greater percent of cell phone ownership in Japan than the U.S.
So, to get the percent of people owned cell phone in United States:



Now, to get the percent of people owned cell phone in Japan:

So, to get the percent greater of cell phone ownership in Japan than the U.S we subtract the percent of people owned cell phone in United States from the percent of people owned cell phone in Japan:

Therefore, the greater percent of cell phone ownership in Japan than the U.S was 13.7%.
Answer:
1. 54
2. 224.4
3. 344
4. 352
5. 516
Step-by-step explanation:
I did all of them but the last one.
Answer:
no these are not equivalent
Step-by-step explanation:
these aunt equivalent because 12+12 =24 and 3+3=6 not 7 or 28 so no ccx these are not equivalent