If a seller notices he or she is not selling much of a particular product, he or she is most likely going to

When there are differences between the cash balance per bank and the cash balance per books, this is due to:____.

QveST [7]

When there are differences between the cash balance per bank and the cash balance per book, this is due to the Bank reconciliation statement.

The key difference between cash book balance and bank statement balance is that cash book balance shows the cash balance recorded in a company's cash book while bank statement balance is the cash balance recorded by the bank in its bank records. is.

Such fees and charges are charged to the savings cash balance book, but no entry is made in the cash book unless the company receives the savings book from the bank and records these entries. This creates a difference between the two balances.

Learn more about cash balance at

brainly.com/question/24979735

#SPJ4

6 0

2 years ago

“Wealth Management Crisis aat UBS” (see file attached)

Delicious77 [7]

1. Based on the <em>“Wealth Management Crisis at UBS,”</em> my opinion is that the government and national culture of Switzerland, the U.S. Treasury, and some corrupt governments around the world, played a major role in aiding the tax fraud scandal committed by more than 52,000 U.S. residents.

The extent to which the corporate culture of UBS also contributed to the scandal is that the bank continued to help these U.S. residents to hide billions of dollars in untaxed assets. Why should the bank deliberately hide accounts for U.S. residents?

2. The global financial crisis between 2007 and 2009 helped in uncovering the secret accounts and tax fraud scandal because its challenges encouraged the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) decided to investigate the tax frauds committed by foreign account holders.

The implication is that without the global financial crisis, the investigations that uncovered the tax fraud would not have been initiated by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) soon.

3. It matters to the entities that could have been impacted by the scandal. For instance, the U.S. Treasury was being deprived of hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes, according to the report.

Without the bailment from the Swiss government, UBS would have collapsed. Many account holders would have lost their savings in the process.

There is no way no losses would not have been incurred if the scandal continued.

4. Importantly, we are not supposed to wait for the next global recession to uncover similar financial scandals and tax frauds around the world.

Thus, tax havens, like the UBS, must come under rigorous investigations from time to time. Such regular investigations would deter would-be tax fraudsters and assets looters from committing to hiding their accounts.

Learn more about asset looting and Wealth Management crises at brainly.com/question/24554162 and brainly.com/question/25664180

7 0

2 years ago

Can somebody help me find a pattern in these numbers?

Papessa [141]

1 and 5 would be the numbers

3 0

3 years ago

Given Ted can wax 4 cars per day or wash 2 cars per day and Tom can wax 3 cars per day or wash 1 car per day. What is each man’s

victus00 [196]

Answer:

OPPORTUNITY cost of Ted=2/4=0.5 car wash

OPPORTUNITY cost of Tom=1/3=0.33 car wash.

OPPORTUNITY cost is amount of other good given to produce more of one good.

Ted has absolute advantage.

Tom has comparative advantage.

Explanation:

See attached picture.

8 0

3 years ago

A tax exempt municipality is considering the construction of a new municipal waste water treatment facility. Two different sites

In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

The incremental benefit/cost ratio for Alt A is 2.15 and The incremental benefit/cost ratio for Alt B is 1.35

Explanation:

In order to calculate the incremental benefit/cost ratio for both of the two alternatives we would have to make the following calculations:

For ALT A

PV of benefits = $2,111,404 * [1-(1.06)^-75]/0.06 = $34,744,943.5

Therefore, incremental benefit cost ratio = $34,744,943.5/$16,161,644 = 2.15

The incremental benefit/cost ratio for Alt A is 2.15

For ALT B

incremental benefits = ($3,019,639 -$2,111,404) * [1-(1.06)^-75]/0.06 = $14,945,777.2

incremental benefits = $27,211,376 - $16,161,644 = $11,049,732

Therefore, incremental benefit cost ratio = $14,945,777.2/$11,049,732 = 1.35

The incremental benefit/cost ratio for Alt B is 1.35

5 0

3 years ago