9514 1404 393
Answer:
h ≤ 6 2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
The inequality is presumed to be ...
15h +40 ≤ 140
15h ≤ 100
h ≤ 6 2/3
__
The graph shows h ≥ 0, because the inequality is only reasonable for h ≥ 0.
Answer:
Line 3 is incorrect; we don't know anything about the lengths of HG, FG, HE, and EF, so this line is not valid based on the given information.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the Noah's poof of the construction, segment EG would divide angle FGH into two equal parts, which makes line 2 to be valid. i.e <EGH ≅ <EGF. And it can also be observed that line 4 is a valid theorem in proving the congruent nature of triangles.
But line 3 is not valid because of the condition of the statement. Furthermore, segments FG, EG, HG, HE and FE may not be congruent. Thus, the condition of the statement in line 3 is incorrect.
Answer:
The answer is B -4
Step-by-step explanation:
An inverse function is a function that will “undo” anything that the original function does. For example, if a function takes a to b, then the inverse must take b to a.
Answer: A Because 29.9 but it was probally rounded off.
Step-by-step explanation: