Answer: Tyler Bank B: $1,180: Mom Bank A: $2,200: Mom Bank B: $1,900
Step-by-step explanation: Look at Picture
You can find counterexamples to disprove this claim. We have positive integers that are perfect square numbers; when we take the square root of those numbers, we get an integer.
For example, the square root of 1 is 1, which is an integer. So if y = 1, then the denominator becomes an integer and thus we get a quotient of two integers (since x is also defined to be an integer), the definition of a rational number.
Example: x = 2, y = 1 ends up with 
which is rational. This goes against the claim that 
is always irrational for positive integers x and y.
Any integer y that is a perfect square will work to disprove this claim, e.g. y = 1, y = 4, y= 9, y = 16. So it is not always irrational.
Give me more points, and I will ;)
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
The largest angle is opposite the largest side and the smallest angle is opposite the shortest side.
Δ FUN
largest angle is ∠ FUN ( opposite FN )
smallest angle is ∠ NFU ( opposite NU )
Δ GEO
largest angle is ∠ GEO ( opposite GO )
smallest angle is ∠ GOE ( opposite GE )
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The longest side is opposite the largest angle and the shortest side is opposite the smallest angle.
∠ RTY = 180° - (70 + 55)° = 180° - 125° = 55°
Δ TRY is therefore isosceles with 2 congruent legs RT, RY
longest side is TY ( opposite 70° )
shortest sides are RT , RY ( opposite 55° )
The triangles are similar, they aren't congruent (identical) though as we don't know if they share a common side
