Answer:
d. Continue production in the short run, but exit the business in the long run unless prices are expected to rise or costs to fall..
Explanation:
Currently, their sales revenue less variable cost is positive as it can sale at $1.50 dollars and the variables cost are less than that. Therefore, there are fixed cost thefirm can pay because it produce.
Now, in the long-run when the firm can exit the market it should consider to do so if it continues to get an average cost above the selling price.
Answer:
It would decrease the net assets by $60,800
Explanation:
The computation of the translation adjustment for 2017 is shown below:
For common stock
= Issued amount × (revised exchange rate - exchange rate)
= $1,000,000 × (0.42 - 0.48)
= -$60,000
For dividend
= Dividend paid × (revised exchange rate - exchange rate)
= $20,000 × (0.42 - 0.46)
= -$800
For net income
= Net income × (revised exchange rate - exchange rate)
= $80,000 × (0.42 - 0.42)
= $0
So, it would decrease the net assets by $60,800 ($60,000 + $800)
The U.S. Supreme Court determine that the federal government did not overstep its bounds under the commerce clause when it enacted the Controlled Substances Act of 1970- Gonzalez v. Raich Case
Explanation:
<u>Gonzales v. Raich</u> was a case in which Raich was permitted to grow and use Marijuana for medical purposes but the federal agents seized the marijuana plantation and destroyed it.
<u>Raich then seeked action under the federal Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act (CFA).
In the decision taken by the U.S Supreme court under the commerce clause of the US Constitution,that the congress has the power to criminalize the use and production of home-grown marijuana even if state law allows its use for medicinal purposes.</u>
I would say it is most likely financial fraud. Hope this helped :-)
