He would be spending less time because 2/3 is not a full number. Let's make an equation out of the: 2/3(m). Note: 3(2) means 3 times 2 and the m is the amount of miles biked last week. We could insert the number 3 to our equation. 2/3(3). Now if you do it the proper way, it is 2/3(3/1) and if you do the math it is 6/3 aka 2. And 2 is less than 3. So it is less time spent
Answer:
Present age
Son: 15
Father: 45
Step-by-step explanation:
Remark
Thank you for the translation. Without it, the problem would be impossible -- at least for me.
Givens
Let the present age of the father = x
Let the present age of the son = y
Solution
x + y = 60
How many years will pass? You could say it's z.
x + z = y When z years pass, the son will be his father's present age.
x + z + y + z = 120 when z is added to both their current ages, the result is 120 Collect like terms
x + y + 2z = 120
<u>x + y = 60 </u> Subtract The very first equation
2z = 60 Divide by 2
z = 60/2 30 years have passed.
z = 30
x + z = y
x + 30 = y Substitute x + 30 for the present y value (the father).
x + x + 30 = 60
2x = 30
x = 15
x + y = 60
15 + y = 60
y = 60 - 15
y = 45
So the son's age right now is 15
The father's age right now is 45
The answer is negative two
Answer:
It's X
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
20%
Step-by-step explanation:
It would be 20% because 35/7 is 5 and 5 goes into 100% 20 times.
