Answer:
C) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is greater than 523.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let μ be the the average attendance at games of the football team
The claim: the average attendance at games is over 523
Null and alternative hypotheses are:
: μ=523
: μ>523
The conclusion is failure to reject the null hypothesis.
This means that <em>test statistic</em> is lower than <em>critical value</em>. Therefore it is not significant, there is no significant evidence to accept the <em>alternative</em> hypothesis.
That is no significant evidence that the average attendance at games of the football team is greater than 523.
Answer:If you would like to know what will the approximate population be after 3 years, you can calculate this using the following steps:
an initial population ... 298 quail
an annual rate ... 8%
an exponential function to model the quail population:
f = 298(1+8%)^t = 298(1+8/100)^t
f ... quail population
t ... time (years)
t = 3 years
f = 298(1+8/100)^t = 298(1.08)^3 = 375.4 quail
375.4 quail after 3 years.
Answer:
x^2y^2 3y^2
Step-by-step explanation:
its a or the first choice
each term is negative and 1/4 of previous term so the nth term is the n-1 term times -1/4 so f(n)= -1/4 f(n-1)