Answer:
c. Differential association theory
Explanation:
Differential association theory
This theory was developed by Edwin Sutherland , according to this theory , via interaction with other individuals , the person him selves learn the attitude , values , motives , techniques for the criminal behavior .
This theory also predicts , the individual will select the criminal path in case , the balance of the definitions for the law breaking exceeds of that of law - abiding .
Answer: He meant that there is no proper policies put in place to prevent more people from being imprisoned.
Explanation:
Dan Pacholke was a reformer and a prison administrator with experience of over thirty years. Pacholke made several efforts throughout his years as a prison administrator to help in improving the living conditions of prisoners, which include giving them education programs and allowing them to be more productive for the economy.
What he meant by saying that the system has become good at containing individuals who have fallen through all other social safety nets, was that there were minimal efforts put in place in order to prevent people from participating in actions that would make them go to prisons. This implies that there were no proactive program to put off people from committing more crimes but a reactive one which would allow people commit more crimes and go to prisons.
Answer:
Extensive social regulation may have an anticompetitive effect.
Explanation:
Social regulation refers to a series of public policies, rules, and laws, implemented by a government that try to determine or influence some economic or social activities. Social regulations are often used with specific goals in mind, such as promoting equality, restrict harmful practices, and protect certain sectors of the population, the environment, etc. However, a side effect of regulatiosn is that they might have an anticompetitive effect. That is, they can discourage private activity because the costs of abiding by the regulations might be seem as too high by some actors, thus preferring to stand aside; also, regulations can distort free markets, leading to distortions in prices and misallocation of resources. On the other hand, often times the costs of social regulations are often easier to measure than their benefits. This is because the costs can be directly measured by the amount of money regulations costs to the government and enterprises, while benefits are more often than not indirect, so there are no immediate indicators for how beneficial regulations can be.
They were connected because they agreed to share
Expanding your discretionary spending
