1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Murrr4er [49]
3 years ago
9

-4+6y=16 Change to slope (intercept)

Mathematics
1 answer:
hichkok12 [17]3 years ago
7 0
*here is step by step*
(Remember to add the 'x' to the slope)

-4x+6y=16

6y=4x+16

y= 4/6x + 2.66

The complete answer is:
y= 2/3x + 2.66
You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
2 years ago
Please help lolol.....
miskamm [114]

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

cuz

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which line plot matches the set of data 61,58,57,64,59,57,64,58,56,57
Alexandra [31]

Answer:

Do you have  picture of the line plots ?

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
There is 12/15 of a pizza left. How many 3/10 pieces can be made from the leftover pizza? Show work please!
Katyanochek1 [597]

How many 1/3 pieces can be made from 2 pizzas, we know it is 6 and it is arrived by dividing 2 by 1/3 or multiplying by its reciprocal 3/1.

Hence to find how many 3/10 pieces can be made from 12/15 pizza, we have to divide 12/15 by 3/10 or multiplying by its reciprocal 10/3, i.e.

12/15 times 10/3= 8/3 or 2  2/3 

What does that mean? This means that while 2 three-tenths pieces can be made, 2/3of 3/10 i.e. <span>2/3×3/10=2/10=1/5</span> or one-fifth of pizza will be left out.

So the answer is 2 three-tenths pieces can be made, and one-fifth pizza will be left out.

5 0
3 years ago
The sum of three positive consecutive integers is 66. what are the three integers​
vredina [299]

Answer: 21, 22, 23

Step-by-step explanation:

you divide 66 with 3, that equals 22, then you have three 22. Then you have to take 1 from one of the 22s and give it to the other one, making it 21, 22 and 23

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Using the greatest common factor for the terms, how can you write 80 + 32 as a product?
    9·1 answer
  • Pls help idk what to do
    14·1 answer
  • Shannon paid $57.25 for 28 pounds of potatoes. Shannon estimated the cost per pound to be $3.00. What is her error?
    10·2 answers
  • Kirima is building a wall for her snow fort. She first makes a firm base out of snow, and then piles uniformly sized blocks of s
    13·1 answer
  • Plsss I need it !!!!!!
    8·1 answer
  • The variable y varies directly as x. when x=20, y=12. what is the value of y when x=15?​
    12·1 answer
  • Given the function<br> f(x) = 4" + 3, what is the value of f(3)?
    14·1 answer
  • Wat iz 1+1 pleas ined hewp
    5·2 answers
  • The perimeter of a square and rectangle are equal . If the square has a side length of 24m and the breadth of the rectangle is 1
    11·1 answer
  • Please someone help me out!!!!! Bill is bying a pair of jeans that costs $20. He has to pay 5% sales tax. How much will he pay i
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!