5 + 8s = 15 + 3s
8s - 3s = 15 - 5
5s = 10
s = 10/5
s = 2 <=== they will charge the same at 2 sq ft
The given triangle is isosceles, so the two remaining angles in the triangle both have measure <em>xº</em>. The interior angles of any triangle sum to 180º, so that
58º + <em>xº</em> + <em>xº</em> = 180º
58 + 2<em>x</em> = 180
2<em>x</em> = 122
<em>x</em> = 61
Angles <em>y</em> and <em>z</em> are supplementary to angle <em>x</em>, so that
<em>xº</em> + <em>yº</em> = 180º
and
<em>xº</em> + <em>zº</em> = 180º
and consequently, <em>y</em> = <em>z</em>. In particular, we get
<em>y</em> = 180 - 61
<em>y</em> = 119
and so
<em>z</em> = 119
Answer:
The answer would be C
Step-by-step explanation:
The only logical reason would be positive because the parabola is opening up. The average rte of change is opening 0.5 per square
Answer:
No, Tina is not correct since 3.4 × 105 = 357 and 8.25 × 104 = 858
