All categories

3 years ago

If a aquadrilateral is equiangular, then it coul be a .....

Mathematics

2 answers:

kupik [55]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Square

Answer A is correct

maksim [4K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

A- square is the answer

You might be interested in

Nadia charges $6.50 an hour for babysitting. She babysits 16.50 hours the first week of the month and 22 hours the second week o

Sveta_85 [38]

She would need to work for 35 hours.

She earned $250.25 total the first two weeks, so divide that by the new rate per hour, $7.15, to get the 35 hours.

4 0

3 years ago

Use each model to predict the life expectancy of residents of a country for which the average annual income is $80,000

Mandarinka [93]

The life expectancies of residents of a country for which the average annual income is $80,000 for the three models are 12309.9352, 172.2436 and 4828.1393

The life expectancies of the models are given as:

$y =69.9352 + 0.1530\times (income)$ --- model 1

$y =4.2436 + 0.0021\times (income)$ --- model 2

$y =4.1393 + 0.0603\times (income)$ --- model 3

Given that the average annual income is $80,000;

We simply substitute 80000 for income in the equations of the three models.

So, we have:

Model 1

$y =69.9352 + 0.1530\times (income)$

$y =69.9352 + 0.1530\times 80000$

$y =12309.9352$

Model 2

$y =4.2436 + 0.0021\times (income)$

$y =4.2436 + 0.0021\times 80000$

$y =172.2436$

Model 3

$y =4.1393 + 0.0603\times (income)$

$y =4.1393 + 0.0603\times 80000$

$y =4828.1393$

Hence, the life expectancies are 12309.9352, 172.2436 and 4828.1393

Read more about linear models at:

brainly.com/question/8609070

4 0

2 years ago

Helppppppp pleaseeeee

AleksandrR [38]

Answer:

is it asking how many times u would get then number 5 when u roll or asking how you would expect for the first 5 rolls?

4 0

2 years ago

A contractor developed a multiplicative time-series model to forecast the number of contracts in future quarters, using quarterl

dusya [7]

There is a missing content in the question.

After the statements and before the the options given; there is an omitted content which says:

Referring to Table 16-5, in testing the coefficient of X in the regression equation (0.117) the results were a t-statistic of 9.08 and an associated p-value of 0.0000. Which of the following is the best interpretation of this result?

Answer:

C. The quarterly growth rate in the number of contracts is significantly different from 0% (? = 0.05).

Step-by-step explanation:

From the given question:

The resulting regression equation can be represented as:

$\hat Y = 3.37 + 0.117 X - 0.083 Q_1 + 1.28 Q_2 + 0.617Q_3$

where;

the estimated number of contracts in a quarter X is the coded quarterly value with X = 0

the first quarter of 2010 Q1 is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the first quarter of a year and 0 otherwise

Q2 is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the second quarter of a year and 0 otherwise

Q3 is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the third quarter of a year and 0 otherwise

Our null and alternative hypothesis can be stated as;

Null hypothesis :

$H_0 :$ The quarterly growth rate in the number of contracts is not significantly different from 0% (? = 0.05)

$H_a:$ The quarterly growth rate in the number of contracts is significantly different from 0% (? = 0.05)

The decision rule is to reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is less than 0.05.

From the missing omitted part we added above; we can see that the t-statistics value = 9.08 and the p-value = 0.000 .

Conclusion:

Thus; we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. i.e

The quarterly growth rate in the number of contracts is significantly different from 0% (? = 0.05)

4 0

3 years ago

Find the simple interest on $500 at six percent for one year

solmaris [256]

Answer: $30

Step-by-step explanation: The formula for simple interest is principal x rate x time.

Putting your numbers into the formula, it will look like this:

I = 500 x .06 x 1

I = 30 x 1

I = 30

The interest on $500 for one year is $30.

7 0

3 years ago