1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bad White [126]
3 years ago
14

A student claims that if she wanted to make a solution quickly, she should use small pellets instead of powder along with heatin

g and stirring. Do you agree or disagree with the student's claim? This is kind of confusing for me so if anyone could help I would appreciate it : )
Chemistry
1 answer:
vova2212 [387]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Yes we agree with the student's claim.

Explanation:

When the molecules are present in smaller size, more reactants can react as decreasing the size increases the surface area of the reactants which will enhance the contact of molecules.Hence, more products will form leading to increased rate of reaction.

On increasing the temperature will make more reactant molecules will have sufficient energies to cross the energy barrier and thus the number of effective collisions increases, thus leading to more products and increased rate of reaction.

When the solution is stirred , the molecule's kinetic energy and thus the rate of reaction increases.

Thus smaller size, stirring and increase of temperature will make the solution quickly.

You might be interested in
Pls help The white light of the sun is a mixture of all the colors.
Anettt [7]

false the black light is

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is zinc not extracted from ZnO through reduction using CO?​
Jet001 [13]
The standard Gibbs free energy of formation of ZnO from Zn is lower than that of CO2 from CO. Therefore, CO cannot reduce ZnO to Zn. Hence, Zn is not extracted from ZnO through reduction using CO
6 0
1 year ago
I WILL RATE BRAINLIEST!!
Taya2010 [7]
The answer is 200 for sure!!!!!
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the mass of 6 atom(s) of copper in grams?
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

6.33×10¯²² g

Explanation:

From the question given above, the following data were obtained:

Number of atoms = 6 atoms

Mass of copper (Cu) =?

From Avogadro's hypothesis, we understood that:

6.02×10²³ atoms = 1 mole of Cu

But 1 mole of Cu = 63.5 g

Thus,

6.02×10²³ atoms = 63.5 g of Cu

Finally, we shall determine the mass of 6 atoms of copper. This can be obtained as illustrated below:

6.02×10²³ atoms = 63.5 g of Cu

Therefore,

6 atoms = (6 × 63.5) / 6.02×10²³

6 atoms = 6.33×10¯²² g of Cu

Therefore, the mass of 6 atoms of copper is 6.33×10¯²² g.

4 0
2 years ago
Which chemical formula corresponds to this structural formula?
lys-0071 [83]
I think the answer is choice D
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What job is in the agriculture career cluster
    9·1 answer
  • What is the name of the covalent compound CCl4?
    11·1 answer
  • The most common isotopic forms of hydrogen are ordinary hydrogen (1H) and deuterium (2H), which have percent compositions of 99.
    5·1 answer
  • Which state of matter takes the shape but NOT the volume of its container?
    5·2 answers
  • Explain how lowering the speed of the current that is transporting sediment could result in the deposition of that sediment.
    7·1 answer
  • How many zinc atoms are there in 65.4 g?
    7·1 answer
  • Compared to the charge of a proton, the charge of an electron has?
    8·1 answer
  • Which information is sufficient to differentiate a
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not a property of water? (3 points)
    10·2 answers
  • Which answer choice is a way to speed up how fast a solute can dissolve in a solvent? A: heat
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!