1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
satela [25.4K]
3 years ago
13

Please help me I have been stuck on this question for ages

Mathematics
1 answer:
Finger [1]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:28 green and 35 red

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

If there are r red counter and g green counter then

Probability of drawing a green counter is P(g)=\frac{4}{9}

and P(g)=\frac{\text{No of g counter}}{\text{Total no of counter}}

Thus \frac{\text{No of g counter}}{\text{Total no of counter}}=\frac{4}{9}

\frac{g}{g+r}=\frac{4}{9}

\Rightarrow 9g=4g+4r

\Rightarrow 5g=4r\quad \ldots(i)

Also if 4 red and 2 green counter is added the probability of drawing a green counter is

P(g)=\frac{10}{23}=\frac{\text{No of g counter}}{\text{Total no of counter}}

\Rightarrow \frac{10}{23}=\frac{g+2}{g+2+r+4}

\Rightarrow \frac{10}{23}=\frac{g+2}{g+r+6}

\Rightarrow 10g+10r+60=23g+46

\Rightarrow 10r+14=13g\ quad \ldots(ii)

Substitute the value of g in equation (ii)[/tex]

\Rightarrow 10\times \frac{5}{4}g+14=13g

\Rightarrow \frac{25}{2}g+14=13g

\Rightarrow g=28

Therefore r=35

Thus there 28 green counter and 35 red counter

You might be interested in
Solve the system by elimination.(show your work)
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer:

x = 1 , y = 1 , z = 0

Step-by-step explanation by elimination:

Solve the following system:

{-2 x + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)

-2 x - y + z = -3 | (equation 2)

2 x + 3 y + 3 z = 5 | (equation 3)

Subtract equation 1 from equation 2:

{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)

0 x - 3 y - 2 z = -3 | (equation 2)

2 x + 3 y + 3 z = 5 | (equation 3)

Multiply equation 2 by -1:

{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)

0 x+3 y + 2 z = 3 | (equation 2)

2 x + 3 y + 3 z = 5 | (equation 3)

Add equation 1 to equation 3:

{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)

0 x+3 y + 2 z = 3 | (equation 2)

0 x+5 y + 6 z = 5 | (equation 3)

Swap equation 2 with equation 3:

{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)

0 x+5 y + 6 z = 5 | (equation 2)

0 x+3 y + 2 z = 3 | (equation 3)

Subtract 3/5 × (equation 2) from equation 3:

{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)

0 x+5 y + 6 z = 5 | (equation 2)

0 x+0 y - (8 z)/5 = 0 | (equation 3)

Multiply equation 3 by 5/8:

{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)

0 x+5 y + 6 z = 5 | (equation 2)

0 x+0 y - z = 0 | (equation 3)

Multiply equation 3 by -1:

{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)

0 x+5 y + 6 z = 5 | (equation 2)

0 x+0 y+z = 0 | (equation 3)

Subtract 6 × (equation 3) from equation 2:

{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)

0 x+5 y+0 z = 5 | (equation 2)

0 x+0 y+z = 0 | (equation 3)

Divide equation 2 by 5:

{-(2 x) + 2 y + 3 z = 0 | (equation 1)

0 x+y+0 z = 1 | (equation 2)

0 x+0 y+z = 0 | (equation 3)

Subtract 2 × (equation 2) from equation 1:

{-(2 x) + 0 y+3 z = -2 | (equation 1)

0 x+y+0 z = 1 | (equation 2)

0 x+0 y+z = 0 | (equation 3)

Subtract 3 × (equation 3) from equation 1:

{-(2 x)+0 y+0 z = -2 | (equation 1)

0 x+y+0 z = 1 | (equation 2)

0 x+0 y+z = 0 | (equation 3)

Divide equation 1 by -2:

{x+0 y+0 z = 1 | (equation 1)

0 x+y+0 z = 1 | (equation 2)

0 x+0 y+z = 0 | (equation 3)

Collect results:

Answer: {x = 1 , y = 1 , z = 0

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ben jogged 4 and 1/2 miles in 1 and 1/4 hours at a constant rate. How far did Ben jog in one hour? *
Mrac [35]

let's firstly convert the mixed fractions to improper fractions and then proceed.

\stackrel{mixed}{4\frac{1}{2}}\implies \cfrac{4\cdot 2+1}{2}\implies \stackrel{improper}{\cfrac{9}{2}}~\hfill \stackrel{mixed}{1\frac{1}{4}}\implies \cfrac{1\cdot 4+1}{4}\implies \stackrel{improper}{\cfrac{5}{4}} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill

\begin{array}{ccll} miles&hours\\ \cline{1-2} \frac{9}{2}&\frac{5}{4}\\[1em] x&1 \end{array}\implies \cfrac{~~ \frac{9}{2}~~}{x}=\cfrac{~~ \frac{5}{4}~~}{1}\implies \cfrac{~~ \frac{9}{2}~~}{\frac{x}{1}}=\cfrac{5}{4}\implies \cfrac{9}{2}\cdot \cfrac{1}{x}=\cfrac{5}{4} \\\\\\ \cfrac{9}{2x}=\cfrac{5}{4}\implies 36=10x\implies \cfrac{36}{10}=x\implies \cfrac{18}{5}=x\implies 3\frac{3}{5}=x

7 0
3 years ago
Solve the equation for the given variable. justify each step.
s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer: y=\frac{5-9x}{2}

s=-30+10t

Step-by-step explanation:

9x + 2y = 5; y

9x-9x+2y = 5-9x

2y=5-9x

y=\frac{5-9x}{2}

1/15s - 2/3t = -2; s

(1/15s - 2/3t = -2)*15     ==> Get rid of fraction by multiplying both sides by 15

s - 30/3 t=-30

s-10t=-30

s=-30+10t

5 0
2 years ago
An article describes a study comparing two methods of measuring mean arterial blood pressure. The auscultatory method is based o
zzz [600]

Answer:

p_v =P(t_{(5)}>0.499) =0.319

The p value is higher than any significance level given for example \alpha=0.05,0.1, so then we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis. So we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the mean reading is greater for the auscultatory method at 5% or 10% of significance.

Step-by-step explanation:

A paired t-test is used to compare two population means where you have two samples in  which observations in one sample can be paired with observations in the other sample. For example  if we have Before-and-after observations we can use it.  

Let put some notation  

x=Auscultatory method , y = Oscillatory method

x: 74 86 84 79 70 78 79 70

y: 70 85 90 110 71 80 69 74

The system of hypothesis for this case are:

Null hypothesis: \mu_x- \mu_y \leq 0

Alternative hypothesis: \mu_x -\mu_y >0

The first step is define the difference d_i=x_i-y_i, that is given so we have:

d: 6.6, 4.2, -5.5, -3.1, 9.3, -3.9

The second step is calculate the mean difference  

\bar d= \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n d_i}{n}=1.267

The third step would be calculate the standard deviation for the differences, and we got:

s_d =\sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (d_i -\bar d)^2}{n-1}} =6.215

The fourth step is calculate the statistic given by :

t=\frac{\bar d -0}{\frac{s_d}{\sqrt{n}}}=\frac{1.267 -0}{\frac{6.215}{\sqrt{6}}}=0.499

The next step is calculate the degrees of freedom given by:

df=n-1=6-1=5

Now we can calculate the p value, since we have a right tailed test the p value is given by:

p_v =P(t_{(5)}>0.499) =0.319

The p value is higher than any significance level given for example \alpha=0.05,0.1, so then we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis. So we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the mean reading is greater for the auscultatory method at 5% or 10% of significance.

5 0
3 years ago
16 + 36 Drag numbers to the lines to create an equivalent expression in factored form
Goshia [24]
Answer:
52
this is most likely the correct answer
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • At a shelter, 1% of the dogs are puppies. There are 8,900 dogs at the shelter. How many are puppies​
    6·1 answer
  • A motorist travelled 300 km
    10·1 answer
  • A small engine can do 1000 joules of work in 45 seconds. Calculate its power in watts. Round
    15·1 answer
  • If 6 × 6 = 36, what value should be subtracted from 36 to find the product of 5 × 6?
    12·1 answer
  • Erica bought 4 shirts at the store, all at the same price. The tax on his purchase was $9, and
    9·2 answers
  • A dirt bike chain fits tightly around two circular gears. Find the distance between the centers of the gears.
    14·1 answer
  • |2x + 3| - 6 = 11 <br> show all work
    10·2 answers
  • Is 7,434 divisible by 6 true are false
    5·1 answer
  • HELPPPPPPP PLEASEEEEEEEEWEEE
    12·1 answer
  • HELPPPP ITS TIMEDDD WILL GIVE BRAINLYISTTTT
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!