1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Drupady [299]
3 years ago
8

Esearchers believed that an increase in lean body mass is associated with an increase in maximal oxygen uptake. A scatterplot of

the measurements taken from 18 randomly selected college athletes displayed a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. A significance test for the null hypothesis that the slope of the regression line is 0 versus the alternative that the slope is greater than 0 yielded a p-value of 0.04.
Which statement is an appropriate conclusion for the test?

(A)The p-value of 0.04 indicates that 4% ofthe variation in maximal oxygen uptake for college athletes can be explained by the amount of lean body mass.
(B) The p-value of0.04 indicates that 16% of the variation in maximal oxygen uptake for college athletes can be explained by the amount of lean body mass.
(C)The strong positive linear relationship displayed in the scatterplot along with a p-value less than 0.05 indicates that college athletes with higher lean body mass tend to have higher maximal oxygen uptake.
(D)The strong positive linear relationship displayed in the scatterplot along with a p-value less than 0.05 indicates that an increase in lean body mass causes an increase in maximal oxygen uptake for college athletes.
(E) A p-value less than 0.05 indicates that the relationship displayed in the scatterplot is likely due to chance, and that there is no statistical evidence ofa relationship between lean body mass and maximal oxygen uptake for college athletes.
Mathematics
1 answer:
Dovator [93]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The correct option is (D).

Step-by-step explanation:

The <em>p</em>-value is well defined as per the probability, [under the null hypothesis (<em>H₀</em>)], of attaining a result equivalent to or more extreme than what was truly observed.

A small <em>p</em>-value (typically ≤ 0.05) specifies solid proof against the null hypothesis (<em>H₀</em>), so you discard <em>H₀</em>.

A large <em>p</em>-value (> 0.05) specifies fragile proof against the <em>H₀</em>, so you fail to discard <em>H₀</em>.

The hypothesis is defined as follows:

<em>H₀</em>: The slope of the regression line is 0, i.e. <em>β </em>= 0.

<em>Hₐ</em>: The slope of the regression line is greater than 0, i.e. <em>β </em>> 0.

A scatter-plot of the measurements taken from 18 randomly selected college athletes displayed a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables; lean body mass and maximal oxygen uptake.

The significance level of the test is, <em>α</em> = 0.05.

The <em>p</em>-value of the test is, <em>p</em>-value = 0.04

As the <em>p</em>-value = 0.04 < <em>α</em> = 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.

So, it can be concluded that there is a statistical evidence of a relationship between lean body mass and maximal oxygen uptake for college athletes.

Since the scatter-plot shows a strong positive linear relationship, it implies that as the an increase in lean body mass causes an increase in maximal oxygen uptake for college athletes.

Thus, the correct option is (D).

You might be interested in
Need help please.........​
professor190 [17]

Answer:

Yes. it is 5. bc u need to trust me

5 0
3 years ago
Mikes fishing lure Is 21 feet below the surface of the water how many feet does he need to reel in his lyre to reach the surface
vekshin1

Answer:

21 feets

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the lure is 21 feets beneath the water surface,

The the elevation of the lure is - 21 feets

If the surface of water = x

Then current distance of lure equals :

x - 21

To obtain the nunber of feets to reach the water surface ;

x - 21 = 0

x = 21 feets

3 0
3 years ago
Answer plz !! Whats the contrapositive ?
Andre45 [30]

Answer:

It should be the first answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

The first answer says "If Nemo is a fish, then he swims". That makes sense. Then the second one says "If Nemo does swim, then he is a fish". That would make sense, but if my name was Nemo, I can swim. That doesn't mean I'm a fish. The the third one says "If Nemo is not a fish, then he doesn't swim". That doesn't make sense. Say my name is Nemo. I'm not a fish. I can swim though!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
John drove 45 miles. This represents 60% of his entire trip what is the total number of miles in Johns trip?
Nonamiya [84]

Answer: John drove 75 miles.


.06 times x equals 45.

x equals 45 divided by .06.

75 = x


6 0
3 years ago
Last Saturday, the MoviePlex theater sold 1,456 tickets. The theater sold 6 times as many regular-price tickets as it sold disco
drek231 [11]
No it is actually 1456•6
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • What equals 29 in stead of 1x29<br> in multipctin
    5·2 answers
  • Points P(6, –8) and Q(–18, 2) are plotted on the coordinate plane.
    6·1 answer
  • A farm stand sold 12 ears of corn for 4$. The farm stand sold 180 ears of corn at the same rate . how much money did the stand e
    13·1 answer
  • Please help I need to answer the questions about the line graph please do as many as you can
    13·1 answer
  • What is the decimal equivalent of each rational number
    13·1 answer
  • What realization did you have with this lesson
    14·2 answers
  • C 80 km 39 km What is the length of the hypotenuse?​
    11·1 answer
  • Which figures can the composite figure be broken into? A. a square pyramid and a square prism B. a square pyramid and a cube C.
    14·2 answers
  • A triangular prism is 18 yards long and has a triangular face with a base of 18 yards and a height of 12 yards. The other two si
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!