Answer:
Mariah trained for months leading up to the marathon and won. Her sole motivation was that after seeing her winning the marathon, her friends and family would call her as motivated and athletic. It means that Mariah wanted to fulfill her esteem needs.
Explanation:
<u>According to Abraham Maslow:</u>
Safety needs includes the personal security, the safety of health, resources and property. etc.
Physiological needs falls at the lowest level of basic needs. It includes food, water, rest. etc which are necessary for an individual's survival.
Esteem includes the need of respect and self-confidence.
Cognitive needs includes the desire of knowledge, to know things, to know what is happening and why is it happening around you.
<u>In Mariah's case</u><u>, she needed respect and motivation and thus she was trying to fulfill her esteem needs by winning the marathon.</u>
<u />
Here We can use principle of angular momentum conservation
Here as we know boy + projected mass system has no external torque
Since there is no torque so we can say the angular momentum is conserved

now we know that
m = 2 kg
v = 2.5 m/s
L = 0.35 m
I = 4.5 kg-m^2
now plug in all values in above equation

![1.75 = [4.5 + 0.245]\omega](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=1.75%20%3D%20%5B4.5%20%2B%200.245%5D%5Comega)


so the final angular speed will be 0.37 rad/s
Conductors allow<span> for </span>charge<span> transfer </span>through<span> the free movement of </span><span>electrons
</span>
For balancing the lever, force on both the sides shall be equal. so,
Force on 3 m end = m × a = 3 × 98.1 = 294.3
Now, on 6 m end, it would be: = 294.3/6 = 49.05
After rounding-off to the nearest hundredth value, it would be: 49 N
Finally, Option A would be your correct answer.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
First uncaused cause
Explanation:
Aristotle states that an infinite regression in the principle of causality is not possible. If the regression were infinite, then there would never be a first cause (mover), since this would need another mover to start its motion. Therefore, according to Aristotle, there must be an unmoved mover that moves other things, but is not itself moved by any prior action,