1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OLEGan [10]
2 years ago
6

Which action can be explained by physics?

Physics
1 answer:
steposvetlana [31]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Actions that underlie mathematical rules, patterns or probability distributions.

For example how fast something falls at any given point or time.

More complex actions, such as human decision making in single individuals would be way too complicated to describe in physical terms.

But note that there can be physical models of such things as traffic when we can assume statistical knowledge of behavior.

Also physical models are used to plan such things as emergency exits in big stadiums, because many thousands of people can be described as particles flowing under a given pressure.

Every time we can gain good statistical knowledge and can therefore see patterns and rules in action, we can build theoretical models to make predictions and simulations (and games btw)

Since it's fair to say that mathematics is the science of patterns, it is plausible that physical descriptions often come in mathematical formulations, so that it can be understand as an efficient language of physics.

Neighboring disciplines like chemistry relay on physical theories to build on them,and then add shortcuts to fit their needs and interests, generating an own language for their field of study. But physicists may refer to them as anadd-on to physics.

Physics can basically explain all actions wich you can express in numbers.

But note that on a fundamental level physics describes 'how' things work, not necessarily 'why' they do it this way. The source of the basic and most fundamental physical constants and rules remains a mystery till this day.But of course there are theories on that as well, wich mostly can neither be proved or falsified.

The text is my own work and based of my general knowledge and quintessence of lectures on physics and other fields I attended.

(I would really appreciate the brainliest)

You might be interested in
Most chemical reactions can be divided into how many main groups?
tatyana61 [14]
There is synthesis
decomposition
double displacement
single displacement
combustion
metathesis
so i guess you could say 6
5 0
3 years ago
1. I drop a penny from the top of the tower at the front of Fort Collins High School and it takes 1.85 seconds to hit the ground
Svetradugi [14.3K]
You have three known variables:

Acceleration - 9.8m/s^2
Time - 1.85s
Initial Velocity - 0m/s

For the first part of your question:

v = u + at

v = (0)+(9.8)(1.1)

v = 10.78 m/s  v=11 m/s (2 significant figures)

For the second part of your question:

v=u+at

v=(0)+(9.8)(1.85)
v=18.13 m/s



This still needs to be converted to m/h:

18.13m/s = 18.13\times 3600 metres/h=65628  metres/hour

65628 metres/hour = 65628\div1600 mi/h = 40.7925 mi/h

= 41 mi/hr (2 significant figures)





5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What law describes light
Darina [25.2K]

The law of reflection

6 0
2 years ago
Select the properties that apply to superconductors.
makkiz [27]
made from pure metals . . . no;
they've been made from all kinds of weird compounds and alloys.
 
conduct electricity with zero resistance . . . yes;
that's why they're called "superconductors".

produce a strong magnetic field . . . possible, but not because it's a superconductor;
just like any other conductor, the magnetic field depends on the current that's flowing in the conductor.

no loss of energy in the transfer of electricity . . .
there's no loss of energy in the current flowing in the superconductor;
but if you tried to transfer the current out of the superconductor into
something else, then there would be some loss.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The graph below shows the relationship between speed and time for two objects, A and B. Compare with the acceleration of object
kolbaska11 [484]

Answer:

A) greater

Explanation:

acceleration is calculated by dividing velocity over time..so by calculating, you find acceleration of A is greater than that of B

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How to describe the motion of an object that has an acceleration of 0 m/s
    11·1 answer
  • Two men decide to use their cars to pull a truck stuck in mud. They attach ropes and one pulls with a force of 598 N at an angle
    15·1 answer
  • A customer sits in an amusement park ride in which the compartment is to be pulled downward in the negative direction of a y axi
    7·2 answers
  • South pole
    12·1 answer
  • The pressure, volume, and temperature of a mole of an ideal gas are related by the equation PV = 8.31T, where P is measured in k
    9·1 answer
  • A long solenoid that has 1,140 turns uniformly distributed over a length of 0.350 m produces a magnetic field of magnitude 1.00
    14·1 answer
  • How do you fix a broken foot
    9·1 answer
  • If my candle has a brightness of 15 candela from a distance of 2 meter. What would the brightness be at a distance of 6 meters?
    13·1 answer
  • Matter that organisms require for their life processes are
    14·1 answer
  • If two objects have different tempters, in which direction will heat move? for how long
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!