Can you tell me whether this represents a function or not? (For both questions, just say ‘Yes or No’)
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Part A:
Given that lie <span>detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector correctly determined that a selected person is saying the truth has a probability of 0.85
Thus p = 0.85
Thus, the probability that </span>the lie detector will conclude that all 15 are telling the truth if <span>all 15 applicants tell the truth is given by:
</span>
<span>
</span>Part B:
Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.25
Thus p = 0.15
Thus, the probability that the lie detector will conclude that at least 1 is lying if all 15 applicants tell the truth is given by:
Part C:
Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.15
Thus p = 0.15
The mean is given by:
Part D:
Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.15
Thus p = 0.15
The <span>probability that the number of truthful applicants classified as liars is greater than the mean is given by:
</span>![P(X\ \textgreater \ \mu)=P(X\ \textgreater \ 1.9125) \\ \\ 1-[P(0)+P(1)]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28X%5C%20%5Ctextgreater%20%5C%20%5Cmu%29%3DP%28X%5C%20%5Ctextgreater%20%5C%201.9125%29%20%5C%5C%20%20%5C%5C%201-%5BP%280%29%2BP%281%29%5D)
<span>
</span>
<span>
</span>
Given that lie <span>detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector correctly determined that a selected person is saying the truth has a probability of 0.85
Thus p = 0.85
Thus, the probability that </span>the lie detector will conclude that all 15 are telling the truth if <span>all 15 applicants tell the truth is given by:
</span>
<span>
</span>Part B:
Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.25
Thus p = 0.15
Thus, the probability that the lie detector will conclude that at least 1 is lying if all 15 applicants tell the truth is given by:
Part C:
Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.15
Thus p = 0.15
The mean is given by:
Part D:
Given that lie detectors have a 15% chance of concluding that a person is lying even when they are telling the truth. Thus, lie detectors have a 85% chance of concluding that a person is telling the truth when they are indeed telling the truth.
The case that the lie detector wrongly determined that a selected person is lying when the person is actually saying the truth has a probability of 0.15
Thus p = 0.15
The <span>probability that the number of truthful applicants classified as liars is greater than the mean is given by:
</span>
<span>
</span>
</span>
Answer:
-
- Dimensions of the flag:
- Area of the flag:
Step-by-step explanation:
<em><u>The missing figure of the exercise is attached.</u></em>
<em><u /></em>
We know that the perimeter of the triangle is given by:
Where "s" is the side lenght of the triangle.
Solving for "s", we get:
Therefore, if the perimeter of the triangle is 126 inches, its side length is:
Since , we know that "s" in feet is:
The area of a rectangle can be calculated with this formula:
Where "l" is the lenght and "w" is the width
We can observe in the figure that the lenght and the width of the flag are:
Then, the dimensions of the flag are:
And the area is:
