Answer:
Perimeter = (11x + 12)
Step-by-step explanation:
Since, perimeter of a polygon is represented by the sum of measures of all sides,
Perimeter of the given polygon = 3x + (x + 10) + 5x + (2x + 2)
By adding like terms of the expression,
Perimeter of the polygon = (3x + x + 5x + 2x) + (10 + 2)
= (11x + 12)
Therefore, expression for the perimeter is (11x + 12).
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Add to both sides:
Subtract 2 from both sides:
Divide both side by 2:
The correct answer is 5460 cubic feet or 5460
Explanation:
The silo has a cylindrical shape, in this context, the volume of the silo or any other cylinder can be calculated by using the formula . In this formula the symbol refers to the number 3.1415..., the letter refers to the radius of the base and the letter refers to the height.
Moreover, in this case, it is known the heigh (21 feet) and the area of the base (260 square feet). Additionally, this area of the base is the result of the formula , which is exactly the first section of the formula to find the volume. This implies that by multiplying the area of the base by the height the volume is known. Here is the process:
or (Area of the base × height)
×
- Given - <u>A </u><u>trapezium</u><u> </u><u>ABCD </u><u>with </u><u>non </u><u>parallel </u><u>sides </u><u>of </u><u>measure </u><u>1</u><u>5</u><u> </u><u>cm </u><u>each </u><u>!</u><u> </u><u>along </u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>the </u><u>parallel </u><u>sides </u><u>are </u><u>of </u><u>measure </u><u>1</u><u>3</u><u> </u><u>cm </u><u>and </u><u>2</u><u>5</u><u> </u><u>cm</u>
- To find - <u>Area </u><u>of </u><u>trapezium</u>
Refer the figure attached ~
In the given figure ,
AB = 25 cm
BC = AD = 15 cm
CD = 13 cm
<u>Construction</u><u> </u><u>-</u>
Now , we can clearly see that AECD is a parallelogram !
AE = CD = 13 cm
Now ,
Now , In ∆ BCE ,
Now , by Heron's formula
Also ,
<u>Since </u><u>we've </u><u>obtained </u><u>the </u><u>height </u><u>now </u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>we </u><u>can </u><u>easily </u><u>find </u><u>out </u><u>the </u><u>area </u><u>of </u><u>trapezium </u><u>!</u>
hope helpful :D
Answer:
In First method : counting up, counting back on a number line,
If we want the quotient after dividing the number by 5 then we count how many 5 we get from 0 to the dividend.
For example :
Since, from 0 to 30 there are six 5's obtained. ( because 5 × 6 = 30 )
Thus,
In Second Method : dividing by 10, and then doubling the quotient.
First we divide the number by 10 then multiply the quotient by 2.
For Example:
Since,
Thus,
Now, when we compare the above methods then we conclude that for the smaller numbers first method is appropriate because for small numbers we can easily count total 5's from 0. While for large numbers Second method is appropriate because it is hard to count the total 5's for the large number.