No he's not correct
<span>(3 – 6y2)(y2 + 2)
= 3(y2) -6(y2)(y2) - 6y2(2) </span>+ 3(2)<span>
= 3y2 -6y4 - 12y2 </span>+ 6 <span>
= -6y4 - 9y2 +6</span>
Answer:
582=-28-2287u272y7329=7373+272387##82838-78338=&*27882029··⇔㏒㏑∞°²³¥378c730+8383749=0891829.9279739383/03980339.83883383383)73837
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
RL=5x+28 and
RO=8X-11
diagonal of square bisect equally the side
:.5x+28=8x-11
11+28=8x-5x
39=3x
x=39/3=13
<u>RY</u><u>=</u><u>RL</u><u>=</u><u>5</u><u>x</u><u>+</u><u>2</u><u>8</u><u>=</u><u>5</u><u>×</u><u>1</u><u>3</u><u>+</u><u>2</u><u>8</u><u>=</u><u>9</u><u>3</u><u>If the answer is 93, move to </u><u>answer</u><u>.</u>
Answer:
It's not possible to reach a conclusion about who will vote candidate Taylor because this is a random sample and not a population census or experiment.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is impossible to reach a conclusion about the proportion of all likely voters who plan to vote for candidate Taylor because the 1,000 likely voters in the sample represent only a small fraction of all likely voters in a large city.
A nice riddle, mathematical riddle.
Assuming a turtle winning means the declared winner is the weaker one actually won over the stronger one. In this context, the turtle winner is the one who has a lesser number of favourable votes.
The given rules for the points are as follows:
1. Point for the first choice must be greater than or equal to that of the second choice.
2. All points must be positive whole numbers.
Let's suppose we have Henry against Tim.
Henry is favourite of the voters and is the leading candidate, according to popular polls.
Tim is an excellent manipulator, sly, and everybody knows this.
On polling day, the vote count came out as follows (in point counts)
Henry Tim
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
10 1 (Henry's own vote)
1 100 (Tim's own vote)
------------------
17 107 TOTAL POINTS
So Tim the turtle was declared winner of the race, and since everything was according to rule, even a recount of the votes did not change the results.
Be aware, voting by districts (instead of popular votes) also exhibits a similar problem.
