Sorry I can't help these answers don't make any sense
Well to solve this, lets plug in some numbers. Lets assume that for now, the starting number is 2. If it increases by 100%, bringing it up to 4, then decreases 100%, it is brought down to zero. Now one thing to note is that any number decrease by 100% is automatically zero. Watch, we start with two, it is then increased by 150%, bringing it up to 5, then decreased by 100%, bringing it back down to zero. In conclusion, 100% cannot be specified as a value, but rather a relation. 100% represents the entire number, meaning that if you are decreasing a number by 100%, you are basically subtracting the number by itself!
Answer:
4/15
Step-by-step explanation:
You would do it as follows
I-8/15I reduce the fraction by 2
I-4/25I the absolute fraction is always positive
So the solution is
4/25
Alternative forms are:
0.16 or (2/5)^2 (Just incase)
The principal square root 4 and its negative -4
Answer:
see attached
Step-by-step explanation:
In the attached, the feasible region is white, and all excluded regions are shaded. When there are so many inequalities, it is easier to see the solution (feasible region) this way. The boundary lines are dashed because they are not excluded. That is, each boundary line is part of the feasible region.
The vertices of the feasible region are shown to aid in any optimization you might want to do. We have shown the values that would apply if there were a constraint y ≥ 0, which is not on your list. (We assume pounds of Brussels sprouts will not be negative.)
__
If you actually do the shading required by the problem statement, you will be shading on the opposite side of each of the lines shown, and you would draw the lines as solid.