Answer:
The correct answer is "$54000".
Explanation:
According to the question,
Annual depreciation rate will be:
= 
= 
(%)
hence,
The depreciation as per double decline will be:
= 
By putting the values, we get
= 
= 
($)
As not everybody can afford designer items, those who can, typically buy such items to increase their self-esteem, and/or view it as an accomplishment. Also, many will do so in a way to view themselves in a higher class than others.
Answer:
2. Limited supply would increase the price
Explanation:
In the given case the vendor sells in advance four thousand units for $300. While the installed capacity of the factory being to produce 1000 smartphones every month.
Expected sales being 500 units per month.
During the first few months, since the seller has already successfully sold 4000 smartphone units, high demand for the smartphones is evident.
Since the supply is limited to 1000 units only in a month and the quantity demanded being more as is evident by 4000 units being pre sold, during the initial phase, this would create a high demand.
And since the supply is limited, the seller will have to increase the price as the demand is lot more.
Answer:
$1,500
Explanation:
Investment interest expenses = Interest Income + Non qualifying dividends
Investment interest expenses = $500 + $1,000
Investment interest expenses = $1,500
$1,500 < $2,500 (Investment interest expenses)
The long term capital gains are not considered in investment income because this income is taxed at a preferential rate. Hence, the Investment interest expenses deduction for the year is $1,500.
Answer:
Answer Illustration : Opportunity Cost of producing Wine is lesser in France, Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters is lesser in Tunisia. So, France has comparative advantage in Wine, Tunisia in Sweater.
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is the cost of next best alternative foregone while choosing an alternative.
Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters & Wine in France & Tunisia are quantities of other goods (Sweaters or Tunias) sacrifised while choosing either. Sweater Opportunity Cost - Wines sacrifised, Wine Opportunity Cost - Sweaters sacrifised.
The country has a comparative advantage in a good if it can produce it with relatively less opportunity cost (in terms of other good sacrifised) than other country.
Ex : Production Possibilities
Wine Sweater Trade off (Wine :Sweater)
France 10 5 1:0.5 or 2:1
Tunisia 8 24 1:3 or 0.33:1
- France produces Wine with lesser opportunity cost (sweater sacrifised) than Tunisia [0.5 sweater < 3 sweaters] ; it has comparative advantage in Wine.
- Tunisia produces Sweater with less opportunity cost (wine sacrifised) than France [ 0.33 wine < 2 wines] ; it has comparative advantage in Tunisia
