Answer:
the Supreme Court ruled that Congress could not outlaw slavery anywhere in the United States.
Explanation:
In the Dred Scott v. Stanford case 1847, Dred Scott sued for freedom citing that as far as he has visited two free states he is automatically a free individual and cannot be re-enslaved. However he lost the case. In 1854, the case was brought to United States Supreme Court and Chief Justice Roger Taney rules against him. In his ruling, he said that all people of African descent, free or slave, were not United States citizens and therefore had no right to sue in federal court. he also wrote that the Fifth Amendment protected slave owner rights because slaves were their legal property.
What does that mean???????????
Answer:
Explanation:
Greek tragedy happening unlucky and comedy is laughing
Answer:
I think...
Explanation:
It made it possible to separate the seeds from the cotton fiber much faster.
It made cotton farming far more profitable for the plantation owner.
It increased the speed at which cotton could be harvested in the fields.
It led to an increase in the number of plantations across the South.
It caused planters to buy more enslaved people to harvest cotton.
Answer:
well for starters no one is really in charge of the government in the us for now.
Explanation:
First of all because the US overment does not run off of dictatorship and instead runs of a Triparite system based off of branches including the senate, the executive branch, and the Legeslative branch. this derives from both the ancient roman Replublic system and from the ancient Greeks. so even if someone tried to take charge of the us government there would have to be a massive debate between the Triparite system and the us citizens.
