What is this answer?

Identify the theorem or postulate that is related to the measures of the angles in the pair, and find the unknown angle measures

aleksley [76]

Angles formed when two parallel are intersected by a common transversal include, corresponding, alternate interior and exterior, same-side interior, and vertically opposite angles

The correct option is Same–Side Int. ∠s Thm. m∠1 = 30°, m∠5 = 150°

The reason the selection is correct is as follows:

The given angles are;

m∠1 = (30·x - 30)°. m∠5 = (40·x + 70)°

∠1, and ∠5, are located on the same side of the transversal and are both formed on the interior side of the parallel lines

Therefore, they are same–side interior angles

Same side interior angles theorem states that same side interior angles formed between parallel lines are supplementary

Therefore, we have;

m∠1 + m∠5 = 180°

Which gives;

(30·x - 30)° + (40·x + 70)° = 180°

(70·x + 40)° = 180°

70·x = 180° - 40° = 140°

$x = \dfrac{140^{\circ}}{70} = 2^{\circ}$

m∠1 = (30·x - 30)° = (30 × 2 - 30)° = 30°

m∠1 = 30°

m∠5 = (40·x + 70)° = (40 × 2 + 70)° = 150°

m∠5 = 150°

The correct option is therefore;

Same-Side Int. ∠s Thm. m∠1 = 30°, m∠5 = 150°

Learn more about parallel lines cut by a transversal here:

brainly.com/question/533025

8 0

3 years ago

Which expression is equivalent to the given expression?

jasenka [17]

Answer:

C.) 2(x-3)(x-4)

Step-by-step explanation:

I think so

8 0

2 years ago

Solve for x.<br> 7 × (3 + 8) = x

Ksju [112]

The answer to this equation is 77.. x=77

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Write an equation in slope-intercept form for the line with slope 8 and y-intercept -8.

Fofino [41]

Answer:

y = 8x - 8

Step-by-step explanation:

y = mx + b is slope-intercept form

m - slope

b - y-intercept

so if you plug in 8 for m and -8 for b you'll get

y = 8(m)x - 8(b)

Hope this helps!!

6 0

3 years ago

Let n1equals50, Upper X 1equals30, n2equals50, and Upper X 2equals10. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. a. At the 0.05 leve

Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} = p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} \neq p_{2}$

$z=\frac{0.6-0.2}{\sqrt{0.4(1-0.4)(\frac{1}{50}+\frac{1}{50})}}=4.082$

$p_v =2*P(Z>4.082)=4.46x10^{-5}$

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion 1 is significantly different from proportion 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

$X_{1}=30$ represent the number of people with a characteristic in 1

$X_{2}=10$ represent the number of people with a characteristic in 2

$n_{1}=50$ sample of 1 selected

$n_{2}=50$ sample of 2 selected

$p_{1}=\frac{30}{50}=0.6$ represent the proportion of people with a characteristic in 1

$p_{2}=\frac{10}{50}=0.2$ represent the proportion of people with a characteristic in 2

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the proportion 1 is different from proportion 2 , the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} = p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} \neq p_{2}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{30+10}{50+50}=0.4$

3) Calculate the statistic

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.6-0.2}{\sqrt{0.4(1-0.4)(\frac{1}{50}+\frac{1}{50})}}=4.082$

4) Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided $\alpha$ , but we can calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a two sided test the p value would be:

$p_v =2*P(Z>4.082)=4.46x10^{-5}$

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion 1 is significantly different from proportion 2.

3 0

3 years ago