Answer:
Mainly, the greatest benefit of solving problems outside the judicial system is the cost, since every judicial process necessarily entails a high cost, both in taxes, costs, fees, etc. In addition, the resolution time is much longer, since it involves a whole series of procedural steps that necessarily imply a passage in time, which can be avoided through an alternative resolution of conflicts.
Those means of alternative dispute resolution include, among others, mediation and arbitration. Mediation, on the one hand, involves a series of meetings between the parties in conflict, with the assistance of a specialist, the mediator, who seeks to bring the parties closer together and achieve the resolution of the dispute. On the other hand, arbitration implies that the parties in conflict abide by the solution proposed by an impartial third party, the arbitrator, who will decide according to the rules of law or equity, as appropriate.
Answer:
Locard exchange is basically wherever you go you always leave something behind...this can help in a crime scene because it can help identify the suspect
Explanation:
things you can leave via Locard exchange
-hair
-fingerprints
-dead skin cells
-shoe print
Explanation:
News values are "criteria that influence the selection and presentation of events as published news". These values help explain what makes something "newsworthy".
It is illegal for a company to hold a monopoly on a good or service is false statement.
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
Monopoly is referred to as situation in the market where there is one and only one player of a particular/bunch of goods or services or both. In the situation of monopoly, the single player can charge the customers as per their wish, as there are no big players in current market. Sometimes, to avoid charging high, government bans company to hold a monopoly. Monopoly can be hold be a company either directly or indirectly.
Company can directly compete and try to take down the other competitors, if any, or directly acquire their company. Or company can indirectly build a very supreme product in such a way that no player is able to compete with them. In some cases, government can ban, but in some cases, even government cannot do anything to remove monopoly. Hence, it is not illegal for a company to hold a monopoly in every case, though it is illegal in few cases, but not in all the goods and services.
