Answer:
Whichever reasoning processes and research methods were used, the final conclusion is critical, determining success or failure. If an otherwise excellent experiment is summarized by a weak conclusion, the results will not be taken seriously.
Success or failure is not a measure of whether a hypothesis is accepted or refuted, because both results still advance scientific knowledge.
Failure lies in poor experimental design, or flaws in the reasoning processes, which invalidate the results. As long as the research process is robust and well designed, then the findings are sound, and the process of drawing conclusions begins.Whichever reasoning processes and research methods were used, the final conclusion is critical, determining success or failure. If an otherwise excellent experiment is summarized by a weak conclusion, the results will not be taken seriously.
Success or failure is not a measure of whether a hypothesis is accepted or refuted, because both results still advance scientific knowledge.
Failure lies in poor experimental design, or flaws in the reasoning processes, which invalidate the results. As long as the research process is robust and well designed, then the findings are sound, and the process of drawing conclusions begins.
little info
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this help
pick me as the brainliest
Step-by-step explanation:
The last step is a little wrong. Lemme show you:
x(x + 2) + (x + 2)
Imagine there is an invisible '1' infront of (x + 2) like this:
= x(x + 2) + 1(x + 2)
Now we can combine the like terms together:
= (x + 1)(x + 2)
This is the correct factorization.
Answer:
4, 13, 28, 49
Step-by-step explanation:
1st term = 3 × (1)² + 1 = 4
2nd term = 3 × (2)² + 1 = 13
3rd term = 3 × (3)² + 1 = 28
4th term = 3 × (4)² + 1 = 49
Answer:
48
Step-by-step explanation:
48 heads =48sheep. .i guess. .......
Stupid do 22949949+r4848488) cuh x9x plays th e sum 69 to find the division time one times to
