Answer:
D. Neither country could gain from trade with each other because neither one has a comparative advantage
Explanation:
Opportunity cost refers to the units sacrificed from production of one good to produce an extra unit of another good.
In the given case, the number of workers are same.
The opportunity cost for producing corn instead of oats by Cornland would be : 10/40 units of oats = 0.4 units of oats
Similarly, the opportunity cost for producing corn by Oatland = 5/ 20 = 0.4 units of oats
Similarly, the opportunity cost for producing oats by Cornland = 4 units of corn
Opportunity cost for producing oats by Oatland = 4 units of corn.
As can be seen, none of the two i.e Cornland or Oatland enjoys a comparative advantage over other since for both, the opportunity cost is the same.
Hence, neither country would gain out of trade.
Answer:
I think its $48,950.
Explanation:
you subtract 4,000 from 52,000 which is 52,000 - 4,000 = 48,000.
then you will add that extra $950 getting you a total of $48,950.
if I'm wrong I'm sorry I'm not that good at math.
D) Checkabe Deposits are assets for the bank
Answer:
Option d (economy of the country) is the appropriate answer.
Explanation:
- Along with many other things, the economy of such a given country is regulated by its society, rules, history, as well as geography, and then it develops out of requirement.
- This example better shows the operational effects of the country's economy although inflation continues threatening the position due to certain external causes and leading to a decrease in present value.
Some other options offered aren't relevant to the situation described. For the aforementioned to be the right answer.