Answer:
none of the tables shown
Step-by-step explanation:
Inverse variation is
xy = k where k is the constant
xy = 4
in the top table
-2*2 = -4 so it cannot be the first table
In the middle table
-2 * -8 = 16 so it is not the middle table
In the bottom table
-2 *4 = -8 so it is not the bottom table
There must be a table not shown
We have that
Profit margin is calculated by finding the net profit as a percentage of the revenue
Profit margin = [Net profit / Revenue]
Net profit= [Revenue-Cost]
we know that
Revenue = $16.25 million
Cost = $13.5 million + $2.7 million
Net profit = [16.25 million - (13.5 million + 2.7 million)]
Net profit = $0.05 million
Profit margin = 0.05 / 16.25
Profit margin = 0.003077 or 0.3077%
The correct answer is: [A]: " 384 in² " .
_______________________________________________________
Explanation:
______________________________________________________
The formula for the surface area of a cube is:
______________________________________________________
→ A = 6a² ;
______________________________________________________ → in which:
______________________________________________________
A = surface area of the cube— for which we shall solve ;
(in "square units" ; or, " in² " ; in our case) ;
a = side length = " 8 in " (given);
→ Note: A cube has all equal side lengths.
→ The "6" in the formula accounts for "6 sides" of a cube.
_______________________________________________________
→ To solve for the surface area of the cube; plug in our known value(s);
& solve; as follows:
_______________________________________________________
→ A = 6 a² ;
= 6 * (8 in)² ;
= 6 * 8² * in² ;
= 6 * 8 * 8 * in² ;
= 48 * 8 * in² ;
= 384 in² ;
_______________________________________________________
The answer is: " 384 in² " ;
→ which is: Answer choice: [A]: " 384 in² " .
_______________________________________________________
4% of the run is 200
as an equation 4%=0.04
0.04*run=200
so run=200/0.04
run=5000feet
Answer:
Eduardo's second statement is wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
Eduardo says that an increase from 10 to 40 is 300% which is true. Because there is an increase by (40 - 10) = 30 and the percent of increase is calculated with respect to 10.
So, % of increase = 
%.
But when we consider a decrease from 40 to 10, then the decrease is by (40 - 10) = 30, but the percent of decrease will be calculated with respect to 40.
Therefore, the % decrease = 
%.
Hence, Eduardo's second statement is wrong. (Answer)
