If i understand your question properly, you want to determine how much each partner wiil have based on the sharing ratio.
Answer:
Alex- $40,000
Brad- $30,000
Carl- $30,000
Explanation:
For a net loss of $100,000 shared between partners in the ratio 4:3:3, the value of each partner's ratio can be calculated as seen below.
Step 1: Add the ratios
i.e; 4 + 3 + 3 = 10
Step 2: Calculate the value of each ratio in $100,000 using te formula
(ratio value ÷ total ratio) × $100,000
For Alex, we have
(4 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.4 × $100,000
= $40,000
For Brad, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
For Carl, we have
(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000
= 0.3 × $100,000
= $30,000
N.B: To confirm if the value of each ratio is correct, you can add up the values to see if it makes $100,000. If it doesn't, then the calculatio is wrong.
Adding the value of the ratios, we have $40,000 + $30,000 + $30,000 = $100,000.
i hope this helps
Your answer is:
It is too difficult to compete with major retailers like Target and Best Buy.
When a lot of people buy things from a store, there is a lot of turbulence in many stores, espeically in big retailers. The answer will be It is too difficult to compete with major retailers like Target and Best Buy.
Best of Luck!
Answer:
Laffer curve.
Explanation:
Laffer Curve is developed by
Arthur Laffer. It is used to show the relationship between tax rates and the amount of tax revenue collected by governments of a particular country. Laffer curve is used to demonstrate Laffer’s argument that sometimes cutting tax rates can increase total tax revenue.
Laffer curve shows the relationship that occurs between the tax rate and the amount of tax revenue collected
The relationship between the tax rate and the amount of tax revenue collected is called the LAFFER CURVE curve. This curve shows that TAX CUT CAN INCREASE TAX REVENUE.
The drawing of a laffer curve has been attached
Answer:
Between 7.8 and 12 Years
Explanation:
The modified duration of a portfolio is defined as a weighted average in the modified duration of an individual bonds. Therefore it will lie between the extreme values of the modified duration of the bonds in portfolio so that the weights are all positive.
In the context, the modified duration lies between 7.8 years and 12 years as the modified duration would always lie between the lowest modified duration and the highest modified duration of any bonds in a portfolio. Therefore the weights are value that will lie between these two years.
<span>The answer is : No coverage for xyx. Bob, an accountant of xyz, drives his own car to the bank to make a deposit for xyz. bob has an at-fault accident. if xyz carries $1,000,000 bodily injury/property damage coverage with a symbol 2 for covered autos, and bob carries no insurance, No coverage is applicable for xyz. </span>
