I would ask them if they were comfortable with a fluctuating rate, which though at the moment is lower than the fixed rate, could go up in the future. I would also ask them if they needed to be sure of the rate say for example for a 5 year term like in a mortgage for peace of mind or if they are willing to take a risk with the fluctuations. If the latter, I would tell them that at any time they could lock it in for a 5 year term if they saw it going up.
Answer:
C) Central banks finance large government budget deficits
Explanation:
Hyperinflation is when general price level rise at accelerating high rates. This leads to loss in real value of currency, people tend to substitute it by other stable currency holdings.
An important cause of Hyperinflation is Deficit Financing. This means government generating funds, by bank issuing (printing) new currency. It is done to cover the deficit, the excess of government expenses over its revenues.
Increase in currency money supply, by borrowing from central bank - raises Aggregate Demand & general price level at a very rapid rate, i.e Hyperinflation
I think it would be b cause when the work is done you cant hire new workers to do what is already done
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
a. . Compute the sales for November.
This will be:
= ($96,000 - $78,800) / 10%
= $17200 / 10%
= $17200/0.1
= $172,000
b. Compute the sales for December.
This will be:
= $78800 / (10% + 30%)
= $78800 / 40%
= $78800 / 0.4
= $197000
c. Compute the cash collections from sales for each month from January through March.
January cash collection:
= ($172000 × 10%) + ($197000 × 30%) + ($135000 × 60%)
= $17200 + $59100 + $81000
= $157300
February cash collection:
= ($197000 × 10%) + ($135000 × 30%) + ($152000 × 60%)
= $19700 + $40500 + $91200
= $151400
March cash collection:
= ($135000 × 10%) + ($152000 × 30%) + ($167000 × 60%)
= $13500 + $45600 + $100200
= $159300
Answer:
No, legal consideration is absent
Explanation:
According to the given situation, the President of ABC company was promised to Helen to give a new car next week as Helen worked for 25 years. But the president did not give the car as he promised to the Helen.
In this case, there was a promise which was verbal, not in the way of legal consideration, which means there is no proof so that Helen can claim from the president.
Therefore the correct answer is No, legal consideration is absent
