<span>Are referred to as science wars. This debate emerged in the 90s about objectivity in scientific research studies. The debate arises as a criticism of various investigations, for example of cultural anthropology or feminist studies. <span>Their originality was questioned, and above all, their objectivity because they considered that the studies were based more on social constructions than on objective facts.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
Answer:
It's a good principle, but not something that can be enforced through government policy. Especially since anyone can call you intolerant if you simply disagree with them.
Explanation:
To be good at math because that’s a stereotype and in their culture people had belief that they have to be hardworkers
Answer:
the middle of Euphrates and the Tigris rivers which is now a part of Iraq. It is known for many things like its city life, literature, math and astronomy. Its climate is hot and gets around 10 inches of rain a year
Explanation:
Answer: 1. Could Tony have done otherwise than to commit his crimes?
Ans= YES.
2. Should he be held responsible for his actions?
Ans= YES.
3. Why?
Ans= Tony was brought up by his parents to the best of their abilities according to the passage. For every human being, there is always a point where you have the ability to make decisions that would determine your outcome in life, in the case of Tony he would have been opportuned to become something better but he decided to continue to tread the path which he did. If he had decided to be something else, he would have achieved it.
Lastly, according to the passage above Tony made a statement "he joked that he would return to fill out an application for the soon to be vacant manager position", this is to show he was not remorseful about his evil deed. So therefore, he should be held responsible for his actions.
Explanation:
