Was the variable "y" supposed to be part of this equation? If so, perhaps you meant to share the following:
<span> 0.24x − 1.85y = 3.09
− 2.33x = 1.71y
Plese, go back and reread the original question, and then ensure you have shared that question here precisely as it was presented.</span>
For this case we must solve each of the equations proposed:
A) 
We apply distributive property to the terms within parentheses:
Subtracting 6 from both sides of the equation we have:
Dividing between -12 on both sides of the equation:
B) 
We apply distributive property to the terms within parentheses:
We add 5m on both sides of the equation:
Dividing between 2 on both sides of the equation:
C) 
We apply distributive property to the terms within parentheses:
We subtract 14 from both sides of the equation:
Dividing between -7 on both sides of the equation:
D) -
We apply distributive property to the terms within parentheses:
We add 28 to both sides of the equation:
Dividing between -21 on both sides of the equation:
Answer:
Answer: it would be 2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>In the second column, we can see that every value of n is being added by 6. </em>
- Thus, the expression is n + 6.
<em>Now, let's substitute the value of n in each column to verify each column. Then, using the expression, let's find the value of n + 6 where n = 28.</em>
<u>When n is 12:</u>
- n + 6 = 18
- 12 + 6 = 18
- 18 = 18
<u>When n is 15:</u>
- n + 6 = 21
- 15 + 6 = 21
- 21 = 21
<u>When n is 21:</u>
- n + 6 = 27
- 21 + 6 = 27
- 27 = 27
<em>Thus, the expression is proven correct. Now, let's find n + 6 when n is 28.</em>
<u>Finding n + 6 when n is 28:</u>
- n + 6 = x
- 28 + 6 = x
- 34 = x
Thus, the missing value in the table is 34.
