It would need to be 16.4592 meters higher which rounds to 16 meters rounded to the nearest tenth
Answer:
She swam a total distance of 2 1/4 miles in those three days.
Step-by-step explanation:
Okay, so- The first thing you need to do is make all denominators equal to make these fractions able to be added together. So, I made all denominators 12. (Tell me if you don't know how to make them all the same denominator, and I'll be happy to help!)
<u>2/3 = 8/12 </u>
<u>3/4 = 9/12 </u>
<u>5/6 = 10/12</u>
Then, I added the numerators together. Like this:
<u>8 + 9 + 10 = 27 </u>
So, this would be:
<u>27/12</u>
Lastly, I changed this improper fraction to a mixed number. I multiplied the denominator twice because it looked like it would be closest to 27 without going over.
<u>12 * 2 = 24 </u>
<em>The "2" will be the whole number in the mixed fraction.</em> Now, I'm going to subtract 24 from the numerator.
<u>27 - 24 = 3 </u>
<u>2 3/12</u>
After simplified, the fraction will be:
2 1/4
<h3>Hope this helps! Let me know if you need help with something else or if you have questions about this problem !</h3>
Under A straight line basis which is a method of computing depreciation and amortization by dividing the difference between an asset's cost and its expected salvage value by the number of years it is expected to be used. Also known as straight line depreciation or straight line amortization, this is the simplest depreciation method. But instead of that find The rate of depreciation
100/5 years=20% depreciation rate per year
Total cost 250×50=12,500
Salvage value 40×50=2,000
Subtract the salvage value from the total cost of televisions
12,500−2,000=10,500
In the first year the depreciation is
10,500×0.2=2,100
Book value
12,500−2,100=10,400
In the second year the depreciation is
10,500×0.2=2,100
Book value
10,400−2,100=8,300
In the third year the depreciation is
10500×0.2=2100
Book value
8300-2100=6200
the book value for all of the televisions at the end of the third year is 6200
For this case we have that by definition, a direct variation is given in the form:
Where:
k: It is the constant of proportionality
According to the statement we have to:
Substituting:
On the other hand we have:
Answer:
