1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhenek [66]
3 years ago
15

When you look at a white light bulb through red sunglasses, why does the light look red to your eyes? What happened to all the o

ther colors?
Physics
1 answer:
Lelu [443]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The answer is explained below in explanation

Explanation:

Whenever light falls on a colored surface, that color of light is reflected by the surface and all the other colors are absorbed. That is a black body appears black in all lights, because it absorbs every color and a white surface appears to be of the color of the light shone upon it because it is the mixture of all colors of light and reflects every color. The eyes only see the reflected light colors. The absorbed colors are not apparent to the eyes.

<u>Hence, when the white bulb is seen through red sunglasses, it does look like red to our eyes, while all the other colors are absorbed by the sun glasses.</u>

You might be interested in
What is the answer?
Andrews [41]

Answer:

6.26 m/s

Explanation:

Pretty slow.... the PE (Potential Energy) at 2m will be converted to KE (Kinetic Energy) at the bottom of the track (neglecting friction)

PE    =   KE

mgh = 1/2 mv^2     divide both sides of the equation by 'm'

gh    = 1/2 v^2             multiply both sides by 2

2 gh = v^2               take sqrt of both sides

v = sqrt ( 2gh) = sqrt ( 2*9.81*2) = 6.26 m/s

3 0
2 years ago
An astronaut with a mass of 91 kg is 0.30 m above the moons surface. The astronauts potential energy is 46 J. Calculate the free
Blababa [14]

Answer:

the free-fall acceleration on the moon is 1.68 m/s^2

Explanation:

recall the formula for the gravitational potential energy (under acceleration of gravity "g"):

PE = m * g * h

replacing with our values for the problem:

46 J = 91 * g * 0.3

solve for the "g" on the Moon:

g = 46 / (91 * 0.3)

g = 1.68  m/s^2

3 0
3 years ago
6 An object can never have
MAVERICK [17]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Speed is the magnitude of the velocity vector, so it can never be negative.

6 0
3 years ago
How would improvement in use of renewable energy sources impact climate change sea-level rise?
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

Almost immeasurably small.

Explanation:

The STORY is that humans are BAD for the environment and have caused a HUGE change in the amount of CO₂ in the atmosphere.

Let's look at the reports and draw our own conclusions.

Current CO₂ levels are 409.8 parts per million (PPM)

at the beginning of the Industrial revolution in the 1700's, the presumed beginning of the huge increase in CO₂ the level was about 280 PPM

For perspective lets assume we capture the whole atmosphere and squish it down to 2400 one liter bottles of air

That's 100 cases of 24 bottles per case.

We now separate all the air components into their own bottles

Nitrogen is 78% of our air, so we subtract 78 cases from our 100 leaving 22

Subtracting Oxygen at 21% of air leaves 1 case of liter bottles left

Of those 24 bottles, Argon makes up 0.93% of air so we subtract 22 bottles

The remaining two bottles contain all of the other gasses in our air, One of those bottles contains CO₂.

If we take the CO₂ levels from the 1700's at about 280 PPM as a baseline and assume ALL of the increase is human caused, that is (410 -280) / 280 = 46 % of the total.

The human caused addition of CO₂ would be 460 mililiters out of 2400 liters over the course of 250 years 

The claim is, that less than half of a liter of CO₂ out of 2400 liters of air is responsible for heating not only the gas in all the other bottles but also the surface of the earth itself.

Personally, it boggles my mind.

And it says NOTHING of a far more powerful greenhouse gas that is far more prevalent in the atmosphere...water vapor.

Water vapor is about 1% of air at sea level and about 0.4% overall. It was not considered in the above analysis because water vapor can condense out and is not a constant in the air.

Notice that there is about 100 times the amount of water vapor in the air as compared to CO₂. Water vapor also has between 4 and 8 times the greenhouse effect that CO₂ does.

Makes one wonder why we choose to pick on CO₂.

7 0
3 years ago
A robot arm moves so that P travels in a circle about point B, which is not moving. Knowing that P starts from rest, and its spe
algol13

Answer

Acceleration=>10.20mm/s

Explanation

Below in image

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which device requires an electric power supply?
    7·1 answer
  • Referring to the _______scale is a way to estimate the wind speed.
    14·2 answers
  • What are the five events that can trigger a mass movement
    8·1 answer
  • Do y’all know the answers to them all the choices are at the drop down box.!!!
    6·2 answers
  • The atomic number of C-14 is _____ and the mass number is _____.
    13·2 answers
  • Under what condition(vector A + vector B)= (vector A) + (vector B) holds good?
    11·1 answer
  • Two balls having different masses reach the same height when shot into the air from
    5·1 answer
  • IM BEGGING FOR HELP!!! According to the figure above, at what altitude is the atmospheric pressure equal to
    9·1 answer
  • A 63.0-kg man is riding an escalator in a shopping mall. The escalator moves the man at a constant velocity from ground level to
    6·1 answer
  • Students were asked to create roller coasters for marbles. The only requirement is that the roller coaster include at least one
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!