1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnesinka [82]
3 years ago
9

Ozzy recently started working at a new company. He has been solicited several times to join the union of the company, but he wou

ld prefer not to. The union officials tell Ozzy that he won’t be allowed to keep working unless he joins the union. Which of the following is true?
Law
1 answer:
Ne4ueva [31]3 years ago
7 0

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

Ozzy recently started working at a new company. He has been solicited several times to join the union of the company, but he would prefer not to. The union officials tell Ozzy that he won’t be allowed to keep working unless he joins the union. Which of the following is true?

-The union officials are pretending they have a closed shop and can't influence Ozzy's decision.  

-The union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.  

-Ozzy must now join the union because union shops are always legal.  

-Ozzy's requirement to join the union depends on his state of employment.

Answer:

-The union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.  

Explanation:

There is a law called the National Labor Relations Act that states that no employee should be required to be part of the union and that membership in the union should not be placed as a requirement for the occupation of a particular labor function. However, some states and some companies may adopt different approaches to their employees and the union.

 In some states in the country, although an employee is not required to become a member of a union, they allow an obligation for all employees to be required to pay at least part of the union's dues. In this case, we can say that in relation to the case shown in the question above, the union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.

You might be interested in
Hurry please! Will give brainliest
pentagon [3]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

because that way it includes not only people inside of the workplace but everyone can be involved

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The minimum BAL at which you are automatically guilty of DUI is _____. A. .12 B. .05 C. .08 D. .10
EleoNora [17]

Answer:c.0.8

Explanation:

Adults with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08 or more are guilty of a DUI, but there is a “Zero Tolerance” law for drivers under 21 years old. This means that drivers who show a 0.01 BAC will face charges for drunk driving.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
What is the top speed of air force one
Naya [18.7K]

Answer:

42069

Explanation:

Its too fast for anyone to understand

7 0
2 years ago
Once a judge has determined that the plaintiff is to be awarded a certain sum of money, the plaintiff may begin the process to o
professor190 [17]

The given is called a writ of attachment or an order of attachment .

<u> Explanation: </u>

In the court of law the defendant is an individual or company accused for committing a crime. If the judge has pronounced a judgement in favour of the plaintiff in the case of any disputes which may be a settlement in the form of money or in the form of assets.

The plaintiff may take the help of the court or court appointed sheriff to settle the dues from defendant. So the court appointed officials will make use of their power and protect the assets being sold. And this court process is known as order of attachment.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What came before Probation?
    9·1 answer
  • The control requirement under § 351 requires that the person or persons transferring property to the corporation immediately aft
    8·1 answer
  • Manpreet reserved a room at the Moonlight Motel. At the last minute, her plans changed making it impossible for her to travel. S
    8·1 answer
  • Amicus curiae briefs: A. help experts testifying in court get their point across. B. provide a way to influence the court when e
    8·1 answer
  • What political factors affect presidents when nominating justices?<br> uthor or not to hear a case?
    9·1 answer
  • In the developing world, most women who achieve political office tend to have family ties to prominent
    6·1 answer
  • Should i ude the P90 on modern warfare?
    6·1 answer
  • Pls hurry i will mark the brainliest has to be right 20 points!!
    5·1 answer
  • Which phrase BEST describes a macro-level event?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the requirements to become a US citizen.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!