Answer:
Explanation:
The 1,2,and 8th amendment contribute to criminal law in the sense that. The first amendment is “right of speech,religion, and press” therefor a case in criminal court would give the defendant legal protection through freedom of press and speech. The second amendment is “the right to bear arm” persons bearing arms legally, if and when used as a self defense weapon in a court case may be spared harsh punishment and none if any is given. And finally the eight amendment is “excessive bail, excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishment.” If a defendant is guilty of committing a crime he/she may be given bail depending on the charges. This amendments limits bail for a guilty defendant so that he/she may not commit the crime more than once and may not have freedom.
I have no credit card so 0
Answer:
The U.S constitution is supreme law of the land.
Explanation:
A law in violation of the constitution, no matter what its source or content may be, will be declared null and void and non-forcible in this land. Thus, the federal statute does not override the U.S Constitution in any case or situation whatsoever. U.s Constitution is supreme on all laws of the land.
However, when there is conflict between federal law and State law, the federal law will prevail because under the U.S constitution it is clearly mentioned that when there is conflict between federal and state law, the federal law will prevail over state law.
Answer:
Since the people are the consumers of these drugs and the ones who choose their political power, you must contest the issue of drugs with them first before actually taking action on the matter of drugs itself. If you declare a war on drugs first without declaring a war on the people, the people have every right to be infuriated and rebel against you as it seems as though you would be threatening an aspect of their individual right: liberty. In this case, the power of liberty assures the people that they have complete freedom to possess and do as they please with drugs without any limitations. By the constitution, the people have every right to go against an individual of power who threatens their individual rights. If you do not provide any reasoning to the people as to why you're declaring a war on the drugs, they will perceive it as a threat to their individual right and an abusive execution of power.