1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Romashka [77]
3 years ago
5

If someone changes in prison and simply becomes a “better person,” not necessarily changes to make a difference in the larger wo

rld, should that person be spared from death or given a lighter sentence in general? Technically changing their behavior alone would-be rehabilitation. Tell me why you feel the way you do. How can we determine if a person has really changed?
Law
1 answer:
Elis [28]3 years ago
3 0

I would say they should be spared from death, but not be given freedom if they have gotten the death penalty they should stay in a prison for life with no chance of parole but still have visitors and phone calls

You can determine if a person has changed by running a series of test like a self evaluation and a psychiatric evaluation and the change to repent there action and admit

You might be interested in
The location where a crime took place is called the __________ crime scene, while the ________ crime scene is where evidence of
igomit [66]

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a three-minute congress debate speech on the following bill-
g100num [7]
I need more information
8 0
3 years ago
What Is sociology ? What Is Photosynthesis ?​
Ainat [17]

Answer:

<h2><em><u>Sociology is the studies on societies and how human act in groups.</u></em></h2><h2 /><h2><em><u>Sociology is the studies on societies and how human act in groups.The process in which green plants use sunlight to make their own food is called</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>photosynthesis</u></em><em><u>.</u></em></h2>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between a consent for the release of information form and a criminal justice consent for the release of i
rjkz [21]
Idk I am sorry I would help you if I would know
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The training that most law enforcement officers receive includes knowledge of cultural diversity.
    11·1 answer
  • 1. Describe the two step process of impeachment.
    11·1 answer
  • Who created the word genocide and why?
    9·1 answer
  • The job of a jury foreperson could be compared to that of a
    12·2 answers
  • Do you think A trump should be elected or B biden should be elected?
    9·2 answers
  • 4. What do you think is more important, our privacy or national security? Explain your<br> answer.
    9·1 answer
  • Indicate the most appropriate if-then statement that the English sentence represents: People 25 years or older do not pay an add
    15·1 answer
  • The type of analysis that focuses on long-term crime trends is termed
    15·1 answer
  • Hey, My dream job is to become a bounty hunter but I've been looking around and can't find what education and etc you need to be
    14·1 answer
  • Citizens who give money to the ACLU expect the money to go toward what?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!