1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aivan3 [116]
3 years ago
15

Calculate the minimum frequency of ultrasound (in Hz) that will allow you to see details as small as 0.193 mm in human tissue. (

Assume the speed of sound through human tissue is 1540 m/s.) What is the effective depth to which this sound is effective as a diagnostic probe?
Physics
1 answer:
STatiana [176]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

f = 7.97 x 10⁶ Hz = 7.97 MHz

Explanation:

The speed of a wave is given by the following formula:

v = f\lambda

where,

v = speed of the ultrasound wave through human tissue = 1540 m/s

f = frequency of ultrasound wave required = ?

λ = wavelength of ultrasound waves = smallest detail required = 0.193 mm

λ = 0.193 mm = 1.93 x 10⁻⁴ m

Therefore,

1540\ m/s = f(1.93\ x\ 10^{-4}\ m)\\f = \frac{1540\ m/s}{1.93\ x\ 10^{-4}\ m}

<u>f = 7.97 x 10⁶ Hz = 7.97 MHz</u>

You might be interested in
The velocity of the transverse waves produced by an earthquake is 8.9 km/s, and that of the longitudinal waves is 5.1 km/s. A se
Brrunno [24]

Answer: The distance is 723.4km

Explanation:

The velocity of the transverse waves is 8.9km/s

The velocity of the longitudinal wave is 5.1 km/s

The transverse one reaches 68 seconds before the longitudinal.

if the distance is X, we know that:

X/(9.8km/s) = T1

X/(5.1km/s) = T2

T2 = T1 + 68s

Where T1 and T2 are the time that each wave needs to reach the sesmograph.

We replace the third equation into the second and get:

X/(9.8km/s) = T1

X/(5.1km/s) = T1 + 68s

Now, we can replace T1 from the first equation into the second one:

X/(5.1km/s) = X/(9.8km/s) + 68s

Now we can solve it for X and find the distance.

X/(5.1km/s) - X/(9.8km/s) = 68s

X(1/(5.1km/s) - 1/(9.8km/s)) = X*0.094s/km= 68s

X = 68s/0.094s/km = 723.4 km

6 0
4 years ago
11)<br> In which state of matter has the LEAST kinetic energy?
klio [65]
Solid particles hope this helped!
5 0
2 years ago
How can a 1kg ball have more kinetic energy than a 100kg ball? Explain both using words and by providing a numerical example
MariettaO [177]

1 kg ball can have more kinetic energy than a 100 kg ball as increase in velocity is having greater impact on K.E than increase in mass.

<u>Explanation</u>:

We know kinetic energy can be judged or calculated by two parameters only which is mass and velocity. As kinetic energy is directly proportional to the (velocity)^2 and increase in velocity leads to greater effect on translational Kinetic Energy. Here formula of Kinetic Energy suggests that doubling the mass will double its K.E but doubling velocity will quadruple its velocity:

\text { Kinetic Energy }=\frac{1}{2} m v^{2}

Better understood from numerical example as given:

If a man A having weight 50 kg run with speed 5 m/s and another man B having 100 kg weight run with 2.5 m / s. Which man will have more K.E?

This can be solved as follows:

\text { Kinetic Energy of } \mathrm{A}=\frac{1}{2} 50 \times 5^{2}=625 \mathrm{J}

\text { Kinetic Energy bf } \mathrm{B}=\frac{1}{2} 100 \times 2.5^{2}=312.5 \mathrm{J}

It shows that man A will have more K.E.

Hence 1 kg ball can have more K.E than 100 kg ball by doubling velocity.

4 0
3 years ago
If the car’s speed decreases at a constant rate from 64 mi/h to 30 mi/h in 3.0 s, what is the magnitude of its acceleration, ass
mixas84 [53]

Answer:3.874 m/s^2

Explanation:

Given

Car speed decreases at a constant rate from 64 mi/h to 30 mi/h

in 3 sec

60mi/h \approx 26.8224m/s

34mi/h \approx 15.1994 m/s

we know acceleration is given by =\frac{velocity}{Time}

a=\frac{15.1994-26.8224}{3}

a=-3.874 m/s^2

negative indicates that it is stopping the car

Distance traveled

v^2-u^2=2as

\left ( 15.1994\right )^2-\left ( 26.8224\right )^2=2\left ( -3.874\right )s

s=\frac{488.419}{2\times 3.874}

s=63.038 m

7 0
3 years ago
What is the resultant of a pair of forces, 100N, upward and 75N, downward?
soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

25N

Explanation:

100 - 75 = 25

That should be right if im not dumb...

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. Suppose that you have a mass of 45.7 kg and are standing on frictionless roller skates. Someone then throws you a 2.50 kg mas
    5·1 answer
  • ametal of mass 0.6kg is heated by an electric heater connected to 15v batter when the ammeter reading is 3A its tempeeature rise
    7·1 answer
  • If you double the mass of an object what happens to the acceleration
    14·1 answer
  • Platinum has a density of 21 g/cm3. A platinum ring is placed in a graduated cylinder that contains water. The water level rises
    10·2 answers
  • Velocity is:
    7·1 answer
  • Two students designed an experiment to study the effect of solar radiations on four cities of Earth. They used a globe to repres
    12·1 answer
  • How much heat is required to increase the temperature of 1 kg of steel from 21 °C to 22 °C?
    14·1 answer
  • 7. If a load of 300N is pulled along the inclined plane shown in the figure, answer the following. B 200 N 0.5m 2m 300 N А i. Ca
    8·1 answer
  • Claire is traveling home when her mother calls and asks her to go to her grandma's house. She is 300 meters north of her house w
    13·1 answer
  • Since many wavelengths of light are measured in nanometers, it's useful to know that planck's constant (h) multiplied with the s
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!