Can u show the whole question plz
Answer:
No, it is not proper to use an infinitely long cylinder model when finding the temperatures near the bottom or top surfaces of a cylinder.
Explanation:
A cylinder is said to be infinitely long when is of a sufficient length. Also, when the diameter of the cylinder is relatively small compared to the length, it is called infinitely long cylinder.
Cylindrical rods can also be treated as infinitely long when dealing with heat transfers at locations far from the top or bottom surfaces. However, it not proper to treat the cylinder as being infinitely long when:
* When the diameter and length are comparable (i.e have the same measurement)
When finding the temperatures near the bottom or top of a cylinder, it is NOT PROPER TO USE AN INFINITELY LONG CYLINDER because heat transfer at those locations can be two-dimensional.
Therefore, the answer to the question is NO, since it is not proper to use an infinitely long cylinder when finding temperatures near the bottom or top of a cylinder.
Answer:
the shape how it involve into a picture
Explanation:
Answer:
Part a)
P = 13.93 kW
Part b)
R = 8357.6 Cents
Explanation:
Part A)
heat required to melt the aluminium is given by
here we have
Since this is the amount of aluminium per hour
so power required to melt is given by
Since the efficiency is 85% so actual power required will be
Part B)
Total energy consumed by the furnace for 30 hours
now the total cost of energy consumption is given as
Distance = speed X time
In this example, the speed of the airplane = 840km. The time (that the question is asking)is how far can it travel in 1 hour.
So just plug in your numbers.
Distance = 840km X 1 hour = 840km/hour or 840km for short.
